I think before you can judge too much, how much did Frank get to spend at Brentford? Not too much I suspect. Certainly a fair chunk less than Spurs
D
Deleted member 21784
Guest
How much have Fulham and Bournemouth spent tho? That's what I'd be looking at
Arthur Wedge
Well-known member
Performance
Id be after him or the Fulham manager .. not the manager who's 1 point above their current
When does a season have 65 games ?
Brentford didn’t have a great season 23/24 but did well last season , finishing on the same points as the Bournemouth manager and above the Fulham manager
Brentford also that season had to deal with losing their best player for half the season
D
Deleted member 21784
Guest
And spurs lost kane..
As explained yesterday the 66 games was because it is for after Ange first 10 games in which he did outstanding but then fell off a cliff. Since then his form has only been better than sides that went down and wolves
Then when you study the table you see Frank's team 1 point above
As opposed to Bournemouth and Fulham
Frank is an average manager , spurs need better than him
They should be asking Fulham how much for Silva
Or even the palace manager .. much higher win rate and won the fa cup with palace after losing one their best players
Arthur Wedge
Well-known member
All it shows is that stats can be manipulated on multiple ways
Brentford finished this season on the same points as Bournemouth, they finished above Fulham , they also finished above Palace
They finished nearly 20 points clear of Spurs this season
66 games ? Silly
Brentford for a team with limited resources have finished 9th and 10th in two of the last three seasons
Fulham spent €92m, €73m, €76m in the last 3 seasons
Bournemouth spent €135m, €127m, €83m
Brentford spent €98m, €72m, €45m
Spurs spent €175m, €252, €180m
Note, values are in Euros and also doesn't take into account sales. (Transfer market com, think it's a German site)
I'd say Frank has done pretty well for Brentford looking at those numbers.
D
Deleted member 21784
Guest
What about palace? Id say out of all of them palace are leagues apart
D
Deleted member 21784
Guest
Jesus h.. I've explained why it's 66 if you don't understand that's on you mate
Arthur Wedge
Well-known member
I do understand it , I think it’s poor attempt to manipulate stats and doesn’t show a full picture
Prefer to use more relevant facts - season upon season performance and mainly the current season
Spurs will be looking at the manager who has helped Brentford to battle close to a European place this season at the same time as playing good football
Palace, €92m, €68m, €46m.
Glasner has done an excellent job.
To be fair, all of those managers of those teams, spurs excepted
, have done a good job. Any of them could have been relegated but all are mid table, playing good football. They are fulfilling their brief each year.
D
Deleted member 21784
Guest
Luckily it's just your opinion, which counts for squat
D
Deleted member 21784
Guest
He is an excellent manager , he should be spurs number 1 priority
Arthur Wedge
Well-known member
Arthur Wedge
Well-known member
Same as yours then
Which manager are Spurs looking at again
And Palace finished below Brentford as well
Arthur Wedge
Well-known member
Palace, €92m, €68m, €46m.
Glasner has done an excellent job.
To be fair, all of those managers of those teams, spurs excepted
Yep they have done well
Silva is the one that’s been around for a little longer than others - prob should have been given a little longer at Everton
The other clubs have bounced up and down in the Prem but getting Brentford into the Prem and staying strong there is excellent
Will be interesting to see how Bournemouth do when they have lost a couple of key players this summer
D
Deleted member 21784
Guest
About as well as they did last summer losing solanke you mean.
Palace may have finished below Brentford but they switched off and focused on the cup
Slime
Tour Winner
Paul, every persons' opinion counts for exactly the same as someone else's.
If he winds you up that much, just ignore him as some others do.
Please don't ruin an otherwise interesting debate by getting overly frustrated.
Arthur Wedge
Well-known member
They will be losing more than one player - 2 of their back 4 will leave along with their GK and a wide player
3 jabber
Well-known member
I think they will do OK. They have Senesi ready to replace Huijsen, bought Soler in January ready to replace Kerkez. I think Semenyo would be a big loss for them though. The unsung heroes at Bournemouth are Kluivert and Christie, hang on to those two and build around them.
Reemul
Head Pro
But yours is no better there is it, like pot and kettle. 66 games as a comparison is a joke really. Season on season will do, but remember it is only my opinion which doesn't mean anything.
