clubchamp98
Journeyman Pro
Imho yes .Crap at his job regardless of who’s playing.
But the caveat is he’s done 23% more Liverpool games than any other ref since 2019.
This is why most bad games have involved Liverpool.
Imho yes .Crap at his job regardless of who’s playing.
Imho yes .
But the caveat is he’s done 23% more Liverpool games than any other ref since 2019.
This is why most bad games have involved Liverpool.
Why do they keep putting him in charge 23% more than any other ref .But only against Liverpool, allegedly.
Why do they keep putting him in charge 23% more than any other ref .
Law of averages says he’s going to make bad decisions if he’s in charge of Liverpools games so much.
Didnt Alex Ferguson try to get a ref banned from UTD games once because of bad decisions agains them?
Cant remember his name!
Would that be acceptable in any other buisness.Moyes said it best
You should ask the referee and see what they think, we have got to the stage where we are settling for a level of officiating where we are all shrugging our shoulders and saying 'OK'.
Bit before his time I think!It certainly wasnt Howard Webb
Would that be acceptable in any other buisness.
Lets be hones footy is big buisness now.
Imho yes .
But the caveat is he’s done 23% more Liverpool games than any other ref since 2019.
This is why most bad games have involved Liverpool.
More recently, he might have had more Liverpool games (not vastly more, maybe just a few more over last few seasons). But his all time record, transfer market site suggests he has refereed in City games more.Why do they keep putting him in charge 23% more than any other ref .
Law of averages says he’s going to make bad decisions if he’s in charge of Liverpools games so much.
Didnt Alex Ferguson try to get a ref banned from UTD games once because of bad decisions agains them?
Cant remember his name!
Best general in the world is only as good as his soldiers.I thought refs would improve under webb. Brilliant referee over the years. Done wonders in the USA with their refs
Comes in.. it's got worse since
But a Manchester based ref doing the majority of Liverpools games !More recently, he might have had more Liverpool games (not vastly more, maybe just a few more over last few seasons). But his all time record, transfer market site suggests he has refereed in City games more.
I don't know how they select referees. Maybe it is partly on how highly they are rated compared to peers, but maybe it is also done geographically. Will a referee who lives up north do more northern clubs, as long as they don't support them or rivals?
People tend to believe stats if it suits their agenda.Stats speak for themselves.
They tell a story on their own without the fluff of the article!
Yes but those games involve Liverpool if he’s there more than anyone else!If a ref does more games the % of good v bad shouldn’t change. For example, if his bad rate is 30% and he does 10 games, 3 are bad. If he does 20 games and 6 are bad it’s still 30%.
Always thought that stats were black and white.People tend to believe stats if it suits their agenda.
Yeah Fergie was probably whinging because he wasn’t getting enough “Fergie time” managers should have no say in who refs their games.Why do they keep putting him in charge 23% more than any other ref .
Law of averages says he’s going to make bad decisions if he’s in charge of Liverpools games so much.
Didnt Alex Ferguson try to get a ref banned from UTD games once because of bad decisions agains them?
Cant remember his name!
Went to Bletchley park and there was a very good section on how stats could be altered to suit one’s agenda. It was eye opening.Always thought that stats were black and white.
How their presented dosnt change that.
115 of them?Went to Bletchley park and there was a very good section on how stats could be altered to suit one’s agenda. It was eye opening.![]()
So Lampard was better than GerrardAlways thought that stats were black and white.
How their presented dosnt change that.