The Footie Thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 15344
  • Start date Start date
Oh come on. That’s just a silly overreaction. The keeper takes Jota. He knows he can’t get to the ball but the ref isn’t gonna give it if he doesn’t hit the floor. So goes down.

“Horrible cheating scumbag”?! Give over

Was the contact enough to trip Jota or make him fall over? Absolutely no chance, therefore Jota has dived and has cheated therefore he's a horrible cheating scumbag. You can defend him all you like but he's cheated to win the penalty.
 
So what, it’s a contact sport, a 3 year old would not have fallen over for a touch like that.

It’s people like you making the sport like it is now, you need to go take a good hard look in the mirror m8.

How am I making the sport like it is now you utter clown.

I have no influence in the game
 
Was the contact enough to trip Jota or make him fall over? Absolutely no chance, therefore Jota has dived and has cheated therefore he's a horrible cheating scumbag. You can defend him all you like but he's cheated to win the penalty.
The only question is “was the contact a foul?” Anything after the contact is irrelevant.
 
No it doesn't. Liverpool should have won about 8-2 at the very least. The score line makes it look a lot closer than it actually was. Liverpool should've been out of sight by halftime.
I dont disagree they shoudl have scored more, but it was a cracking game and the correct team won. What an advert for the PL
 
The touch doesn’t have to knock him over straight away

The touch didn't knock him over at all, let alone straight away. He felt a touch and dived/cheated. Not every contact is a foul and a penalty. Jota dived and cheated because the contact wasn't enough to make him fall over.
 
The touch didn't knock him over at all, let alone straight away. He felt a touch and dived/cheated. Not every contact is a foul and a penalty. Jota dived and cheated because the contact wasn't enough to make him fall over.

According to the ref and VAR he didn’t dive or cheat
 
The touch doesn’t have to knock him over straight away
True, but it is meant to be in the same moment or movement. He doesn't look remotely impacted by it though, unlike Diaz in the first half which was also slightly delayed but was linked to the contact. Jota felt it, wasn't impacted, thought about it, threw himself down.
 
No mention of the unpunished Jolinton fouls that should have finished with a red?
Yes I would like to know why he didn’t book him for that blatant pull back.

The Jota pen for me is strange why didn’t he just score?
The keeper gets him and maybe the speed he’s going brings him down but it just looked so late going down.

Great second half from reds but we need a goalscorer.
Imagine how many Kane would score in this Liverpool team.
 
Top