BrianDamage
Assistant Pro
There's no question Flintoff was a better bowler than batter. Absolutely none. He was one of the best quicks in the world when his body permitted. So quick, accurate and hostile. Could move it off the seam both ways, and very adept at reverse swing. He was not a good batsman in my opinion. He was a bit of a slogger, poor technique, who really should never have batted no. 6. If he couldn't bowl for some reason then he would never have played for England because as a batsman only he wasn't good enough.