D-S
Well-known member
It seems as if the BBC PR department really care.Does anyone actually care who wins this?
It seems as if the BBC PR department really care.Does anyone actually care who wins this?
It seems as if the BBC PR department really care.
Honestly, not really. The short list is a bit of a joke - Stokes I get, Beth Mead sort of (though what she did to be picked ahead of the others in her side I have no idea) but thereafter its a tad odd. What did Matt Fitzpatrick, Jonny Bairstow, Cameron Norrie do to offend them?Does anyone actually care who wins this?
Weston Super Mare ?I used to enjoy watching it, but not these days. I'm looking forward to WSM even though I know who's won ?
Always makes me laugh when people have so little interest in a subject they have to comment about it ?
I guess I want to be interested, it was a massive thing when growing up but now just a shadow of that. There is a big place for an annual celebration of sporting achievement but this is not it and is now slightly embarrassing. I think people used to care and want to care again and hence the comments
I guess I want to be interested, it was a massive thing when growing up but now just a shadow of that. There is a big place for an annual celebration of sporting achievement but this is not it and is now slightly embarrassing. I think people used to care and want to care again and hence the comments
It's pretty cringey stuff.Sorry but who is “embarrassed” by it ?![]()
Which is standard Award ceremony stuff which has been the way for decadesIt's pretty cringey stuff.
Sorry but who is “embarrassed” by it ?![]()
Which is standard Award ceremony stuff which has been the way for decades
It’s a program to give an awards to sporting stars and teams - it’s always quite staggering how some react to it
What’s different to how it was 20 years ago ?The show is pretty embarrassing quality wise compared to what it used to be. It is overly staged and as said, cringey, embarrassing that this is meant to be the annual celebration of sporting achievement
What’s different to how it was 20 years ago ?
They run through the nominees
They go through as many sports showing highlights of each sport and the many achievements they can fit in - have the odd bit of cheese , multiple interviews and then hand out the awards
It’s your standard award ceremony and each year it’s full of the countries sports stars
I watch it every year and apart from the odd gimmick it’s no different than when I first started watching it in the 80’s
What should it be ?
20 years ago was only 2002, from my point of view, and I guess a few others, they are comparing it to what it was going much further back. I have been watching it since the 70's. The whole thing was totally different focused on the review if the year in sport with loads of footage and interviews and the award was presented at the end. The focus was the review of the year with none of the standard awards ceremony stuff
It still has loads of footage , they now do a lot more different sports across the night and not just mainstream sports , also highlight a lot more local sports with the unsung award.
It has a bit more “jazz” and they try to make it a bit more modern to ensure it appeals to both new and old
But the premise of the show is the same
Footage of sporting events - hand out awards , interview multiple sports stars