DanFST
Head Pro
Thy actually got it horribly wrong. It wasn't supposed to be lofted up. They only added that when they realised it didn't work without it. What they got, was lucky.
Quite a big statement, any proof for this?
Thy actually got it horribly wrong. It wasn't supposed to be lofted up. They only added that when they realised it didn't work without it. What they got, was lucky.
Quite a big statement, any proof for this?
Yeah, I sat in the TM european HQ with a few other forummers last year and was told it by one of their product guys. Straight from the horses mouth you might say.
Yeah, I sat in the TM european HQ with a few other forummers last year and was told it by one of their product guys. Straight from the horses mouth you might say.
Thy actually got it horribly wrong. It wasn't supposed to be lofted up. They only added that when they realised it didn't work without it. What they got, was lucky.
The whole loft up malarkey isn't just born out of a low spin head and needing loft to get it into the air. Yes that is part of it but it also stems from people not delivering enough dynamic loft at impact through mostly negative angles of attack.
If folks teed the ball higher and hit up on it then you wouldn't need so much loft to find an optimal launch angle.
yep, the prev drivers ive had have always been tee's pretty low, when i got the SLDR, i started teeing it up higher and got way better results, even into the wind.
The whole loft up malarkey isn't just born out of a low spin head and needing loft to get it into the air. Yes that is part of it but it also stems from people not delivering enough dynamic loft at impact through mostly negative angles of attack.
If folks teed the ball higher and hit up on it then you wouldn't need so much loft to find an optimal launch angle.
and how does that explain those who have lofted down?
Don't ask me, it was a TM product guru who said it. However, there are always exceptions to every rule.