More spending per head because more tax is raised per head maybe?
Only a wiki link as I couldn't be arsed looking further.
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Government_spending_in_the_United_Kingdom
I'll be voting no, but I don't like this thought that Scots are subsidy junkies!
The figures are always going to be skewed anyway, England has a much larger population and would therefore require less spending per head on say a hospital than the other UK nations, simple math really. You would get a clearer picture if you took spending per head of population from geographical areas in England for comparison, say NW,NE,SW,SE,Midlands and London for example. Not sure how that would compare but I have a feeling it would paint a different picture perhaps.
I think its more complex than the spending per head. The cost of a hospital bed in England is the same as the cost in Scotland, but the hospitals are usually bigger - note usually. I'm well aware of the size of the likes of the (new) Southern General in Glasgow.
Saying a hospital in Scotland costs the same as one in England ignores the fact that most hospitals built in England are usually bigger because of population densities.... so although the cost per head is less, the actual cost of the build is more... its them damned statistics, and lies, again.