Beezerk
Money List Winner
But that's where Tony Benn's Five Questions of Power/Democracy truly apply!
*opens Google in another web page*
But that's where Tony Benn's Five Questions of Power/Democracy truly apply!
The entire debate is being framed in a very narrow corridor.Does it really matter about military or currency?Does anyone seriously think we'll be decimated by yes?We'll have no money or no soldiers?Doe sthe demand for clarity on answers from Salmond by Darling really progress things?Why does the white paper have to be the reference point for everything?The SNP or Labour or Conservative or Green are not that important.
Everything, everything will work itself out as best as possible.Will it be better than rUK?I don't actually care.I'm not competing with rUk to be better than them, just the same.Will be get into the EU?Probably, but so what?Same applies to NATO.Folk are framing this entire debate in such a narrow perspective it's a crying shame.We're debating (sometimes agressively, but tahts good imo) the rebirth of a nation, one that would want to be a good partner, a responsible neighbour and a contributing society.A nation that wants to take responsibility and accountability for itself.For me, thats awesome.Terrifying,exciting and draining all at the same time and I cannae wait.
Agree I think there's a serious risk a No vote will imply a backing for the status quo when it could also be a simple vote against the only choice on offer, but that's the risk of a single question referendum
I see what your saying about a re-run but I fear it would just roll on for decades until political or social changes swing a sufficient majority one way or t'other
As one of the Scottish diaspora (only gone 30 months & who'll return sooner rather than later) I'd love to be part of the decision but I've had to accept that if I get it then a 70 year old who emigrated from Carnoustie to Canada 65 years ago would also get a say and I don't really want that (whatever the cut off it will always disadvantage someone)
And as a general comment to save a separate post:
I still see far too many side issues being cited in order to justify a vote for either side. Does anyone really believe that Scotland will descend to third world status in the event of a Yes, or be invaded, or have no currency in our wallets etc etc?
Independence will be a tough road and might even cost a shilling or two more but the choice of self determination has to be separated from the posturing and scaremongering (from both sides)
In truth we don't actually need definitive answers right now to every possible post yes scenario for defense, currency, health, education etc. This is far bigger than any of these things
I see and read about political & other figures round the world saying don't do it, don't go... but in truth every one of them are looking from the outside & looking out for their own interests and what Scottish independence might mean to their model of the world
Only the people in Scotland are looking from the inside out (& not even all of them) so its no surprise many on here cant grasp what attraction Independence holds
Speaking of contingency plans, I just heard on the radio that the UK Treasury have finally admitted to having one post YES.
It was in true Yes Minister 'Mandarin' speak actually, contingency plans to make a contingency plan.
Better hurry folks only two weeks to go.
The entire debate is being framed in a very narrow corridor.Does it really matter about military or currency?Does anyone seriously think we'll be decimated by yes?We'll have no money or no soldiers?Doe sthe demand for clarity on answers from Salmond by Darling really progress things?Why does the white paper have to be the reference point for everything?The SNP or Labour or Conservative or Green are not that important.
Everything, everything will work itself out as best as possible.Will it be better than rUK?I don't actually care.I'm not competing with rUk to be better than them, just the same.Will be get into the EU?Probably, but so what?Same applies to NATO.Folk are framing this entire debate in such a narrow perspective it's a crying shame.We're debating (sometimes agressively, but tahts good imo) the rebirth of a nation, one that would want to be a good partner, a responsible neighbour and a contributing society.A nation that wants to take responsibility and accountability for itself.For me, thats awesome.Terrifying,exciting and draining all at the same time and I cannae wait.
Did you seriously think they didnt have one? are you that naive!
Take off your rose tinted glasses a minute and enlighten us? please don't use the YES campaigns words of "wonderful, successful, buoyant, happy, prosperous, thriving etc etc without any detail as they have/are doing.
There are some on here that think an independent Scotland will be like Brigadoon, just perfect and full of happy clappy people who think it will be alright in the long run, they don't know why but they are sure it will be. Unbelievable.
I'd like to see the whole world ending the twin scourges of nationalism and religion that divide us and coming together for the benefit of all mankind. Lol, I said it - bring on the withering put down.
...
And they're polarized sunglasses not rose tinted
When did anyone say it's Scotland's fault ?
Also when did anyone say that because England and Wales can't do something Scotland also can't ?
I often read here the point that many of the issues supporters of YES Scotland state as reasons for independence are the same issues that many in England and Wales have. The conclusion being that these are not good reasons for voting YES.
I know you didnt, maybe read the post again but properly.I didn't use any of those words & doubt I'll waste any on your facetious reply either
And they're polarized sunglasses not rose tinted
I know you didnt, maybe read the post again but properly.
However, I'm actually not interested in your reply, I could write it for you as you're clearly in the "it'll be alright on the night" camp.
What a great method to decide how to use your vote.
What a great method to decide how to use your vote.
I know you didnt, maybe read the post again but properly.
However, I'm actually not interested in your reply, I could write it for you as you're clearly in the "it'll be alright on the night" camp.
What a great method to decide how to use your vote.
You are being a bit selective there Mac.
The whole of the UK voted in New Labour under the slogan........Things can only get better.
There has to be a leap of faith anywhere a new government is formed, Scotland is no different.
CMAC "....please don't use the YES campaigns words of "wonderful, successful, buoyant, happy, prosperous, thriving etc etc without any detail"
Your quite right of course, you actually asked me not to do something I wasn't doing anyway! As I said, facetious post