Swinglowandslow
Well-known member
you ask why
Answer- because that is the way the law works.
As I understand it
Pleading innocent leaves a path open for the verdict to be overturned on appeal if there is found to be other evidence supporting the innocent plea as have many of the convictions using this route.
There is no such path in law once a guilty plea (however wrongly given) was given. This would have been the reason that a lot could not join the class action.
I do agree there would have been many who fell foul of the computer system but I would suspect there were a few on the fiddle and got caught so knowingly pleaded guilty.
Criminal law, yes. ? but civil law, ( talking about compensation here), I see no reason why the P.O. should not do the right thing now , and compensate those "c aught by the computer" It is those we are talking about.
As for those who pleaded guilty, they would have been pressured to do so by many saying the computer was infallible and there is no way their knowledge of their innocence would prevent conviction.
In the hope for a lighter sentence many may have been advised to so,plead.
And before you say"I wouldn't, if I hadn't been guilty", it is easy to say but there are many serious considerations in such a God awful situation.