Why? It's factually correct.To be fair, that dart board could have been posted with a Darwin Nunes tagline, Havertz or similar.
Had it been a generic, 'women taking penalties' it would have been removed. However, after the other night, you can't argue against England or Sweden being specifically quoted![]()
No, that would be casual sexism. Maybe not that casual.Why? It's factually correct.
No that would be factually correct. Women footballers are not as skillful as male ones. Nothing sexist about stating facts.No, that would be casual sexism.
Not sure skilful is the right word, but I know what you meanNo that would be factually correct. Women footballers are not as skillful as male ones. Nothing sexist about stating facts.
Again, sexist comment, not fact.No that would be factually correct. Women footballers are not as skillful as male ones. Nothing sexist about stating facts.
As bad as the penalty taking was in that shootout, the England women's wide players could teach the men's team a thing or two about putting effective crosses into the danger zone between penalty spot and 6-yard box.No that would be factually correct. Women footballers are not as skillful as male ones. Nothing sexist about stating facts.
As bad as the penalty taking was in that shootout, the England women's wide players could teach the men's team a thing or two about putting effective crosses into the danger zone between penalty spot and 6-yard box.
And Chloe Kelly has about the best ball striking technique in English professional football.
We really really need a face palm emoji