Jeremy Corbyn

It's not the accuracy of Brimstone that worries me, it's the accuracy of the "intelligence" that picks the targets that worries me.

That intelligence seems to be working very well finding targets in Iraq

And it's helping the Iraq army fight back against ISIS
 
In their thousands. When did that happen or are we going back to the crusades

I'm sorry, but have you actually looked at numbers of civilian deaths in iraq, caused by the west? Different sources have put this number at over 100,000. I understand that the US are much bigger than us, but if you're going to dismiss my use of the word thousands out of hand, then i dont know what to say
 
I'm sorry, but have you actually looked at numbers of civilian deaths in iraq, caused by the west? Different sources have put this number at over 100,000. I understand that the US are much bigger than us, but if you're going to dismiss my use of the word thousands out of hand, then i dont know what to say
Not a figure I have seen but if your source is good then it must be correct
 
Going on a couple of different places, there was a telegraoh article (
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wor...ears-on-at-least-116000-civilians-killed.html )

And the websites
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article3750.htm
https://www.iraqbodycount.org

Athough the latter do look a tad biased, the DT article iseems a bit more neutral
Any deaths are to many but the wikileaks document from 2004-2009 gives 66,081 civilian deaths. Now given the length of time given I would suspect a large number could go down to Iraq on Iraq.
 
If these figures are to be believed it seems that Jeremy Corbyn's views are pretty much identical to a large majority of the labour membership when it comes to the question of bombing IS in Syria.......

Syria.jpg

Apologies for the image from the Daily Mail.
 
Defense Minister admitting that we will not destroy IS by bombing alone.....we all know now what that means.

Defense committee guy stating that a lot of the weapons and vehicles used by IS are produced in the USA.
Perhaps they are also using some of the old UK stuff when we supplied both Iran and Iraq.
 
Defense Minister admitting that we will not destroy IS by bombing alone.....we all know now what that means.

Defense committee guy stating that a lot of the weapons and vehicles used by IS are produced in the USA.
Perhaps they are also using some of the old UK stuff when we supplied both Iran and Iraq.
Who ever said that bombing alone would destroy IS completely? No-one.
If ground troops are needed after targets are taken out, so be it. We have to do whatever it takes to rid ourselves of this evil cancer. Those who oppose action MUST come up with a credible alternative to solve this issue or just be quiet.
We are talking about protecting innocent people the world over. That is what we have a military for, and thank God we do.
 
Defense Minister admitting that we will not destroy IS by bombing alone.....we all know now what that means.

Defense committee guy stating that a lot of the weapons and vehicles used by IS are produced in the USA.
Perhaps they are also using some of the old UK stuff when we supplied both Iran and Iraq.

Which is why it's important to continue to bomb them, this softens them and reduces their mobility to take over other cities/towns and grab more weapons and more importantly ammunition which is the hardest thing for them to acquire, whilst stunting their mobility this also allows the Kurds to protect their borders and push back ISIS where possible, they can't achieve this without us bombing and the Brimstone is the perfect weapon for that as it's a very clinical and precise bomb and as such can make a huge impact on reducing their (ISIS) mobility.
 
Top