Jeremy Corbyn

Well that's another question entirely but all I am looking for is an acknowledgement that mistakes happen and a genuine desire to minimise the chances of mistakes.

Of course mistakes happen - they have happened in the past

That's why things like brimstone are introduced - to reduce the risk of collateral damage and why joint intelligence sections created from the brightest and best people and only acting on the best intelligence that can be found

If something has been targeted then everything possible humanly has been done to minimise the risk and to ensure the intelligence is correct

That hasn't always been the case before with too much been relied on foriegn intelligence
 
On a slight tangent I am struck by the irony of our desire to blow up Islamic State with Brimstone missiles while we also sell them to Saudi Arabia.

That is the big question that needs answering - Saudi have Typhoon jets capable of delivering the Brimstone - so what course of action will they take. They need to be involved
 
Well that's another question entirely but all I am looking for is an acknowledgement that mistakes happen and a genuine desire to minimise the chances of mistakes.
Humans are involved, mistakes will always happen. People have to be realistic and acknowledge that and it would help if those above would admit it as well. That doesn't mean nothing should be done to neutralise the effect that IS is having.
 
Hear they have found a suspect package in London

What would it take for you to think it's time to act against terrorists ?

Are you seriously suggesting that bombing terrorists (a) in Syria is going to prevent terrorists (b) planting bombs in London?
If this is the case, why did we not bomb Ireland when the IRA were bombing London and Birmingham?
 
Are you seriously suggesting that bombing terrorists (a) in Syria is going to prevent terrorists (b) planting bombs in London?
If this is the case, why did we not bomb Ireland when the IRA were bombing London and Birmingham?

I just asked at what stage would you think the use of force is needed as right now you would prefer to do nothing

And taking out suicide bombers will reduce their capability to harm innocent lives .
 
I just asked at what stage would you think the use of force is needed as right now you would prefer to do nothing

And taking out suicide bombers will reduce their capability to harm innocent lives .

Even though there are undoubtedly cells already spread across the globe, especially in Europe as Paris showed. Bombing "may" have a place but it won't get rid of the threat, won't exclude the need for troops on the ground, and the inevitable casualties that will bring, on an very long term operation, and certainly won#t stop those cells already trained and being trained around the world. I fear that while intelligence may have a handle on some, it won't stop others, eithe as part of an organised strategy or as lone operators to continue to deliver their brand of terrorism
 
Top