Jeremy Corbyn

Only as much as every PM. And even some of those that thought Blair was brilliant at the time of his first election win, hated him with a passion after Iraq.


No arguments from me on that - hence why I think the last great leader the nation had was Churchill
 
Answer - did Winston Churchill ?

I don't know - what I do know is he United the country at one stage in his reign as PM

But I'll bow out at the stage of you avoiding the direct questions Chris.
 
I don't know - what I do know is he United the country at one stage in his reign as PM

But I'll bow out at the stage of you avoiding the direct questions Chris.

So did Maggie - she liberated the Falklands, that got her another term of office! He won the war and didn't get elected!
 
Answer - did Winston Churchill ?

Yes he did. He was an MP in a number of constituencies, thanks to either losing in elections or selection when he crossed the floor of the house. And he again crossed the floor later in his political career. There was also a number of serious strikes towards the end of the war, as people fell out with him and his policies. And he was severely shocked to lose the election immediately after the war.

He, like many leaders, was a marmite person. Either loved or hated.... sound familiar?
 
So did Maggie - she liberated the Falklands, that got her another term of office! He won the war and didn't get elected!

Do you really think the Falklands United the country behind Thatcher ?!?

Yep I'm out on that note
 
Do you really think the Falklands United the country behind Thatcher ?!?

Yep I'm out on that note

Yes, she was losing popularity, and so were the Cons, in the run up to the Falklands. And when she went to the polls afterwards she won quite comfortably - suggests she won people over.
 
Yes, she was losing popularity, and so were the Cons, in the run up to the Falklands. And when she went to the polls afterwards she won quite comfortably - suggests she won people over.

Winning people over isn't uniting the country behind her though

Edit : damn it said I was out :o
 
But I'll bow out at the stage of you avoiding the direct questions Chris.

I've seen it all before, ask the same points you've made throughout in the form of individual questions and then try to suggest that I support your arguments and therefore you're conclusion is right - I don't agree the initial premise that a great leader can't divide people, Field Marshall Montgomery was highly disliked but a great leader of his time
 
It's been mentioned a couple of times in this thread that if Corbyn gets the Labour leadership then Labour would become unelectable and the Tories without a credible opposition could tear themselves apart. Is it not possible that if Corbyn did become Labour leader that the Labour party could end up splitting with Corbyn leading a left wing Labour party and A N Other leading a centre left version of the Labour party/

For clarity I am not suggesting that either party would split as I have no idea but am simply asking the question.
 
I can't see them splitting immediately but if the forecast landslide GE win for ghe Tories in the next one then action like that coild happen and if it does then would it make the Tories even stronger ?
 
It's been mentioned a couple of times in this thread that if Corbyn gets the Labour leadership then Labour would become unelectable and the Tories without a credible opposition could tear themselves apart. Is it not possible that if Corbyn did become Labour leader that the Labour party could end up splitting with Corbyn leading a left wing Labour party and A N Other leading a centre left version of the Labour party/

For clarity I am not suggesting that either party would split as I have no idea but am simply asking the question.

The Labour Party splitting has happened not that long ago, and pretty much on the back of Labour swinging to the left. After several disaterous elections New Labour emerged with a more centre stance under Blair and 3 election victories ensued. Seems like Labour are repeating their mistakes...
 
So did Maggie - she liberated the Falklands, that got her another term of office! He won the war and didn't get elected!

Thatcher didn't win in 1983 on the crest of the Falklands wave (though it did her "iron lady" image no harm). She won because labour had lurched to the left, the centre left had gone their own way in the SDP and what was left under Michael Foot were frankly unelectable. They are in big danger of going down the same road.
 
Survival of the fittest - it applies not just a biology lesson about evolution, but also people, cities, regimes, businesses, countries etc etc

The manufacturing, mining, textiles etc etc industries and the cities that used to thrive on them were being artificially propped up at the detriment of the economy since the war - something had to change or we would have been left further behind than we are. Does anyone propose that we should still be active in these industries on a global scale?!

Many suffered as a result of Thatcher, many others prospered. I'd argue that the national economy today is in a far better place than had a Labour/Trade Union govt been in power for those terms - and so the short term pain has led to long term gain for millions.

And this 'managed decline' term has been used more in this thread than the 15 years of Thatcher govt where it was used once in a private letter!!

The Thatcher version was more like eugenics than evolution. Survival of the fittest occurs following random changes and mutations not planned ones.
 
Last edited:
Top