RGuk
Tour Winner
Like I have been saying, in a roundabout way, things are getting a little crazy with green fees. I think, as with all things these days, the value of anything (service, product etc.) is more about what people are "prepared" to pay, other than what makes sense.
I had to sort a tax issue out and went to visit a guy who said he would do it at £150 per hour. I politely replied that as I'd studied 3 more years than him and had a doctorate, I would rather struggle with it myself than pay 3 or 4 times my own rate for his services.
I don't blame golf clubs for charging what they can get away with, and the staff/managers/shareholders of superb courses deserve the financial reward for hard work etc. etc. OF COURSE.
I also think the corporate market is well worth tapping, the big firms that make mega-bucks on the back of ordinary folk ought to spend some of the exorbitant profits on rewarding their workers, sure, most of them deserve it. My bro is a lawyer, his company pay him £30 p/h and bill the clients at £200 p/h, I think he deserves a few posh days out.
OK, rant done.
BUT, the bottom line is ordinary players of modest means are losing out on the heritage and history of our great courses (and getting to play them) because the green fees are way out there.
My solution would be to challenge some clubs to offer a few tee times, off peak, to real club golfers at a sensible price. I can't see how they could lose out (it would we a win-win), because you can bet your life the full paying societies/corporate groups won't be playing at 7.38 am or 4.46 pm. It'll never happen though.
To think, my bro/dad/sis-in-law have all played the great courses like Walton Heath, Sunningdale, Belfry, Wildwood(?), East Sussex, blah, blah, and they don't even play golf....
HOW SAD IS THAT?
It's true, really, and no-one wants to talk about it.
When was the last time a golf mag told both sides of the story...never...they can't afford to voice an opinion because the readership are their careers and wage packets.
Dave
I had to sort a tax issue out and went to visit a guy who said he would do it at £150 per hour. I politely replied that as I'd studied 3 more years than him and had a doctorate, I would rather struggle with it myself than pay 3 or 4 times my own rate for his services.
I don't blame golf clubs for charging what they can get away with, and the staff/managers/shareholders of superb courses deserve the financial reward for hard work etc. etc. OF COURSE.
I also think the corporate market is well worth tapping, the big firms that make mega-bucks on the back of ordinary folk ought to spend some of the exorbitant profits on rewarding their workers, sure, most of them deserve it. My bro is a lawyer, his company pay him £30 p/h and bill the clients at £200 p/h, I think he deserves a few posh days out.
OK, rant done.
BUT, the bottom line is ordinary players of modest means are losing out on the heritage and history of our great courses (and getting to play them) because the green fees are way out there.
My solution would be to challenge some clubs to offer a few tee times, off peak, to real club golfers at a sensible price. I can't see how they could lose out (it would we a win-win), because you can bet your life the full paying societies/corporate groups won't be playing at 7.38 am or 4.46 pm. It'll never happen though.
To think, my bro/dad/sis-in-law have all played the great courses like Walton Heath, Sunningdale, Belfry, Wildwood(?), East Sussex, blah, blah, and they don't even play golf....
HOW SAD IS THAT?
It's true, really, and no-one wants to talk about it.
When was the last time a golf mag told both sides of the story...never...they can't afford to voice an opinion because the readership are their careers and wage packets.
Dave