Old Skier
Tour Winner
No I think like you they are against it. :lol:If Gove, Farage, Johnson, Galloway, Grayling and Duncan-Smith are for it then, whatever it is, I am against it.
No I think like you they are against it. :lol:If Gove, Farage, Johnson, Galloway, Grayling and Duncan-Smith are for it then, whatever it is, I am against it.
As some on hear have argued quite forcefully that the EU is not run but an unelected body of commissioners could they clarify how today the commissioners can announce an additional amount of several billion EU to be spent on the refugee crises.
Dont get me wrong, I'm not arguing against money being spent on the crises, it's more to do with how an unelected body can announce an increase in funding which would mean an increase of contributions by member states without a vote by the elected body taking place?
As I understand the commissioners are like an executive board. They are appointed by the European council who are basically all the heads of state, and then approved by the European Parliament, who are elected by us. I suppose that was thought to be the best way to run it.
As some on hear have argued quite forcefully that the EU is not run but an unelected body of commissioners could they clarify how today the commissioners can announce an additional amount of several billion EU to be spent on the refugee crises.
Dont get me wrong, I'm not arguing against money being spent on the crises, it's more to do with how an unelected body can announce an increase in funding which would mean an increase of contributions by member states without a vote by the elected body taking place?
As I understand the commissioners are like an executive board. They are appointed by the European council who are basically all the heads of state, and then approved by the European Parliament, who are elected by us. I suppose that was thought to be the best way to run it.
As good a reason as any to stick with my out vote...
A whole bunch of unelected suckarses deciding where my hard earnt gets spent...
No doubt all on mega salaries...
Thanks, just cannot understand how they have the authority to add to a members contributions with out a vote being taken either by the country which is likely to pay the extra or the 751 MPs that sit in the parliament.
An element of that is true. And also an element is exaggeration. And where you sit on the leave/stay will probably depend on which part you most believe.
The part that I question the most is always...
How much bureaucracy do we actually need???
And, from where I am sitting, the EU just loves piling more and more levels into 'the pie'...
Great if you are getting to eat from it but not so good if you are paying for it...
The part that I question the most is always...
How much bureaucracy do we actually need???
And, from where I am sitting, the EU just loves piling more and more levels into 'the pie'...
Great if you are getting to eat from it but not so good if you are paying for it...
And I would agree with a lot of that. I just feel that it is a price worth paying for the benefits I think I brings. Just.
Do you actually know what the head-count is? Or have you merely been a (possibly willing) victim of the propaganda from the likes of DM and UKIP!
By getting approval for the Budget from the EU Parliament - which IS the elected body!
But the point is that (according to the news item), the new money has already been promised by the commission but no vote has yet been taken in the EU Parliament.
When our govt sends money for disaster relief or other such things it doesn't ask parliament for permission, it just does it. Whether or not you agree with what they are doing they are acting no differently than our own govt does in similar situations.
...
Seeing the head of the fisheries commission [or whatever other grand title he may have] on Countryfile a few weeks back told me all I need to know about the EU and bureaucracy...
We have an overseas aid budget for things like disaster relief.