EU Referendum

SocketRocket

Ryder Cup Winner
Joined
Sep 12, 2011
Messages
18,151
Visit site
We have developed a "throwaway" culture. We dispose of perfectly workable goods, in a quest to stay relevant and significant. We display our wealth like a badge of honour, little caring that it is built on exploitation of the third world. This culture has been force fed to us by a political elite, financed by big business, all in the name of continuing growth. Any attempt to move away from that model will be met with significant resistance.

* All typed on an iPhone, whilst watching the cricket on Sky, on a large flat screen Sony TV!!!!

I tend to agree with this
 

Fish

Well-known member
Banned
Joined
Jun 25, 2012
Messages
18,384
Visit site
We have developed a "throwaway" culture. We dispose of perfectly workable goods, in a quest to stay relevant and significant. We display our wealth like a badge of honour, little caring that it is built on exploitation of the third world. This culture has been force fed to us by a political elite, financed by big business, all in the name of continuing growth. Any attempt to move away from that model will be met with significant resistance.

* All typed on an iPhone, whilst watching the cricket on Sky, on a large flat screen Sony TV!!!!

In the bedroom whilst the kids watch TV in their bedroom and hid watches Eastenders downstairs on the latest curve TV in HD with 2 cars out the front
 

bluewolf

Money List Winner
Joined
Nov 30, 2010
Messages
9,557
Location
St. Andish
Visit site
I tend to agree with this

Which goes to show that if you discuss something for long enough, you'll eventually realize that you share a similar viewpoint :thup:

In the bedroom whilst the kids watch TV in their bedroom and hid watches Eastenders downstairs on the latest curve TV in HD with 2 cars out the front
The only TV rule in my house. No TV's in the bedroom. Or consoles etc. The boy has a computer for his schoolwork, but if you want to watch TV then you do it downstairs.
 

Fish

Well-known member
Banned
Joined
Jun 25, 2012
Messages
18,384
Visit site
Which goes to show that if you discuss something for long enough, you'll eventually realize that you share a similar viewpoint :thup:


The only TV rule in my house. No TV's in the bedroom. Or consoles etc. The boy has a computer for his schoolwork, but if you want to watch TV then you do it downstairs.

Do you lock them in the coal shed also, and if they don't eat their meat they don't get any pudding 😂😂
 

FairwayDodger

Money List Winner
Joined
Dec 11, 2011
Messages
9,622
Location
Edinburgh
Visit site
The UK is not insular or inward looking. We trade, have immigration, emigration and cooperation with the world. Leaving the EU is not sticking two fingers up at our continental neighbours. There is no evidence that the UK doesn't want to trade, cooperate, have emigration and immigration with the countries of Europe.

The problem is not the UK. The problem is the EU.

The EU does not allow free trade. It is very unlikely to allow an independent UK to trade freely with European countries. They will insist we pay a fee for the privilege of trading with other European countries... that's not us doing that They will restrict access to their union... that's not us doing that. Free movement of people is their ridiculous trading restriction... not ours. It is not the UK that is inward looking or insular, it is the EU.

Do you think the trade deal the EU is trying to make with the USA is going to include them adopting EU laws and the free movement of people?

The reason they can't give us the same deal as the USA is that it will be obvious that as a country you are better off not in the EU.

The reason European countries are EU members is because the EU makes it almost impossible not to be. The EU is not good for Europe or the rest of the world. It is just a hideous organisation that exists because it exists. It's existence relies on people believing it is necessary and it isn't. If it didn't exist we would simply deal with individual countries as we do with the rest of the world. It is authoritarian, it dictates social practice, it is intolerant of different practices and you can't leave with impunity. It is a fascist cartel.

All the argument is about whether the UK can survive as an independent nation. It is obvious it could if the EU didn't exist. The EU is the only thing that makes it difficult. They will make it difficult because their own meaningless existence depends on it. Do Germany want to sell us cars? Do you think they would like free trade with us? Do you think they would insist on free movement of people between our countries for this? I think all European countries would want to trade with us without any suggestion of sharing social policies or practices. The reason they can't is because the fascist cartel dictates that they can't.

The UK should leave and then state it will trade freely with EU countries. Any deal they offer that includes their social polices should be rejected. Then the countries of Europe might see that the EU does not work in their best interest. Insisting we allow free movement of people to trade with European countries is not in the best interest of the individual countries. We should take the huge risk to get rid of the EU.

The EU is not a socialist organisation. It has some very rich countries and some very poor countries. There is nothing socialist about that. The free movement of people simply allows rich countries to abuse the disadvantaged. The UK has millions of foreign people living on the poverty line in slums and ghettos of our cities. We are not helping these people, we are exploiting them. Taking fit and skilled people from eastern European countries isn't helping their countries, it's helping ours. These people aren't here because they wanted to leave their home land to live in slums and be racially abused. They are here because they have no choice. And we happily exploit their situation.

This has helped make the UK wealthy but thankfully it has to stop. Mass immigration has turned normally liberal but patriotic Brits into racists. Continuing this policy will result in political and civil unrest and eventually civil war. We must either become less wealthy or find another way to create wealth.

Interesting how people can have such diametrically opposite views. I'm actually chuckling and shaking my head while reading this. Although I accept you are sincere and entitled to your opinion.
 

SocketRocket

Ryder Cup Winner
Joined
Sep 12, 2011
Messages
18,151
Visit site
Interesting how people can have such diametrically opposite views. I'm actually chuckling and shaking my head while reading this. Although I accept you are sincere and entitled to your opinion.

It's not only his opinion though, many of us share it completely. Maybe you do need to question your views ;)
 

Pro Zach

Assistant Pro
Joined
Dec 22, 2011
Messages
254
Location
Yorkshire
Visit site
Interesting how people can have such diametrically opposite views. I'm actually chuckling and shaking my head while reading this. Although I accept you are sincere and entitled to your opinion.

You have to be able to accept your own beliefs may be wrong to here others beliefs without chuckling and shaking your head. And most people can't.
 

Hobbit

Mordorator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 11, 2011
Messages
19,681
Location
Espana
Visit site
We have developed a "throwaway" culture. We dispose of perfectly workable goods, in a quest to stay relevant and significant. We display our wealth like a badge of honour, little caring that it is built on exploitation of the third world. This culture has been force fed to us by a political elite, financed by big business, all in the name of continuing growth. Any attempt to move away from that model will be met with significant resistance.

* All typed on an iPhone, whilst watching the cricket on Sky, on a large flat screen Sony TV!!!!

As part of my English Highers in 1976 I wrote a piece about big corporations and planned obsolescence. And that industry needs it to allow it to grow. I argued that you didn't have to grow, only to sustain a viable society. I got an 'F' and a roasting from the English teacher for being a communist.

Being a bit wiser, older really, I'd say that growth still isn't needed but new innovations are. It isn't an extra TV, it's a better TV.
 

FairwayDodger

Money List Winner
Joined
Dec 11, 2011
Messages
9,622
Location
Edinburgh
Visit site
Break the circle then. I would never be so crass to suggest your opinion was nonsense though, only different. Vive le difference.

That's pretty tame compared to some of the insults you've dished out on this thread. It's an emotive subject, though, so I don't want to be too hard on you. Anyway, I'm done arguing for now. The vote didn't go the way I'd like but let's see what happens when we get a new pm.
 

Foxholer

Blackballed
Joined
Nov 16, 2011
Messages
24,160
Visit site
As part of my English Highers in 1976 I wrote a piece about big corporations and planned obsolescence. And that industry needs it to allow it to grow. I argued that you didn't have to grow, only to sustain a viable society. I got an 'F' and a roasting from the English teacher for being a communist.

Being a bit wiser, older really, I'd say that growth still isn't needed but new innovations are. It isn't an extra TV, it's a better TV.

That's actually an example of the obscene way in which some supposed 'teachers' can actually be 'indoctrinaters'! Their role should be to teach HOW to think, not WHAT to think!

And, btw, I believe that growth is essential - because business is competitive! whether or not the growth of a particular company or sector is beneficial for society in general depends on how that growth is utilised!
 

Pro Zach

Assistant Pro
Joined
Dec 22, 2011
Messages
254
Location
Yorkshire
Visit site
That's actually an example of the obscene way in which some supposed 'teachers' can actually be 'indoctrinaters'! Their role should be to teach HOW to think, not WHAT to think!

A teacher wrote in my school report “John asks too many questions” 40 years later I still don't know whether to laugh or cry. I have often argued that rational thinking should be taught in schools but the faith schools are against it for some reason.
 

Hobbit

Mordorator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 11, 2011
Messages
19,681
Location
Espana
Visit site
You have to be able to accept your own beliefs may be wrong to here others beliefs without chuckling and shaking your head. And most people can't.

But she's not wrong, and neither are you. It's about a choice of lifestyle. Some lifestyle choices come at a cost. It may well be that the lifestyle choice of being outside the EU costs more or less, financially and politically.
 

Hobbit

Mordorator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 11, 2011
Messages
19,681
Location
Espana
Visit site
A teacher wrote in my school report “John asks too many questions” 40 years later I still don't know whether to laugh or cry. I have often argued that rational thinking should be taught in schools but the faith schools are against it for some reason.

Strangely enough, it was a faith school.
 
Top