Beezerk
Money List Winner
You must get all the chicks
You must get all the chicks
I don't get where these theories of inaccuracy come from. It's 2015, not 1965
Mfrs have to allow a margin of error. If they set the speedometer to be 100% accurate but some marginal error occurs then they could be sued if you pick up a driving ban for speeding thinking you are under the limit. The margin they allow is tight but very understandable. My car, according to gps, is really doing 67mph when the speedometer states 70. Makes sense to me in the world of litigation that we now live in.The GPS in my car agrees exactly with the speedometer , from 30 through to thoroughly unlegal speeds. I don't get where these theories of inaccuracy come from. It's 2015, not 1965
That self righteous knob who's doing 49Mph in the outside lane of a 50Mph section of roadworks, oblivious (or not if he's a proper tw@t) that there's a huge line of traffic behind him!
I'm a little puzzled by the pretty much universal hatred of cyclists by motorists.
I'd like to know why motorists actually object to them. While I recognise that that it's another 'variable' that they have to consider, I'm inclined to believe that it's simply jealousy of their 'freedom' to make significantly more progress in cities than motorists do! I don't actually object to them disobeying some of the rules that motorists must obey - I've experienced 'turn left on Red' and it generally works - nor undertaking stationary or even slow moving traffic. Of course, in country lanes they can get in the way, but only for a short time and it's normally the motorist that is actually reckless in such 'confrontations'!
I do have to confess a slight bias though. I would be a cyclist, but some sod stole mine, even though it was locked to a well lit cycle stand - next to a Railway Station! That's the 3rd occasion I've had one stolen from this sort of place! The next security measure will be a dirty great chain motorcycle lock!
Don't know about country cyclists but as far as London goes, it's the stinking hypocrisy that comes with no small number of them; as was alluded to elsewhere in the thread, they will break every rule in the Highway Code yet expect everybody else to play by the rules, and are the self appointed judge & jury if they consider somebody else is it the wrong. They complain about the lack of cycle facilities yet don't use the ones that there are or bomb down the footway when it suits, actually shouting at pedestrians to get out of the way. Does that give you a clue?
I know it is not all of them, but I would say I've encountered more ignorant cyclists than drivers in London. It is actually that bad that on occasions when I have cycled to work in London and was stopped at red lights on a pedal cycle, motorists waiting at the same light felt that worthy of mention,which should give you an idea of the level of red light running.
Much the same here, as I said another thread I can't stand poeple that moan. I can make an exception for Audi drivers though.:thup:Driving rants?
None.
20yrs ago when I went out on the road as a field service engineer I ranted for England every minute of every day. Now I just smile and then forget just as quickly.
BTW, I'm an Audi driver, and all non-Audi drivers are kn0bs!
You still haven't answered why the casual 'turn left on Red' is considered such a crime - to be noted when it doesn't happen. I believe that it should actually be legitimised in most cases - it can actually help motorist throughput (by clearing the mass of cyclists at the front the queue) at many intersections too!
Don't know about country cyclists but as far as London goes, it's the stinking hypocrisy that comes with no small number of them; as was alluded to elsewhere in the thread, they will break every rule in the Highway Code yet expect everybody else to play by the rules, and are the self appointed judge & jury if they consider somebody else is it the wrong. They complain about the lack of cycle facilities yet don't use the ones that there are or bomb down the footway when it suits, actually shouting at pedestrians to get out of the way. Does that give you a clue?
I know it is not all of them, but I would say I've encountered more ignorant cyclists than drivers in London. It is actually that bad that on occasions when I have cycled to work in London and was stopped at red lights on a pedal cycle, motorists waiting at the same light felt that worthy of mention,which should give you an idea of the level of red light running.
I believe i have;
So not actually any proper reason! My 'jealousy' (envy may be a better description) description was probably appropriate. And that does cover most of the 'hypocrisy' - at least about the turn left on Red. The use of footpath is not to be encouraged, but is often forced, as it is on much of my High St!
Here's a vid of an incident that fortunately isn't typical! From about 45 secs http://www.london24.com/news/crime/...cked_by_white_van_man_in_hornchurch_1_3919752 Warning - contains strong language and violence!
So not actually any proper reason! My 'jealousy' (envy may be a better description) description was probably appropriate. And that does cover most of the 'hypocrisy' - at least about the turn left on Red. The use of footpath is not to be encouraged, but is often forced, as it is on much of my High St!
Here's a vid of an incident that fortunately isn't typical! From about 45 secs http://www.london24.com/news/crime/...cked_by_white_van_man_in_hornchurch_1_3919752 Warning - contains strong language and violence!
Yes, for a proper reason; red lights apply to all road users, until that changes then cyclists are as bound by then as any other road user. If cyclists don't like that, petition Parliament to change the rules, but until then play by them.
Nothing whatsoever to do with jealousy, so your description was totally inappropriate, whereas as mine about the self appointed judge & jury fits quite well for your response. Good afternoon.