Could sports direct/direct golf be good for golf.

D

Deleted member 18121

Guest
They've bought an existing company that will continue to sell what was already on Sale.... its not new. Nothing will change.
 

Ethan

Money List Winner
Joined
Jun 30, 2009
Messages
11,793
Location
Bearwood Lakes, Berks
Visit site
So they both wear a different branded shirt but with Dunlops logo's on, is that not false representation which could be said to be deceiving the watching public and fans into buying the same, which it isn't in truth?

How do you know this?

I thought everyone knew this. You commented on it when it came up several years ago.

Clarkey wears Peter Millar, I forget what Westie wears.
 

Fish

Well-known member
Banned
Joined
Jun 25, 2012
Messages
18,384
Visit site
I thought everyone knew this. You commented on it when it came up several years ago.

Clarkey wears Peter Millar, I forget what Westie wears.

I can't remember last night never mind several years ago!
 
D

Deleted member 15344

Guest
Can't see it being bad for golf

Cheap clubs and cheap clothes which people can purchase as starters to the game
 

LUFC 1972

Head Pro
Joined
Nov 17, 2012
Messages
254
Visit site
There is a place for sports direct, my son wanted to try golf at 10 and for first 3 years used Dunlop clubs as they were cheap, he has moved on now to premier brand clubs, but the same with clothes and shoes as they grow so quickly it was the most cost effective way to replace stuff every six months.

Also sd do own European golf who stock lots of different brands and have some great deals
 

Craigg

Q-School Graduate
Joined
Dec 31, 2014
Messages
941
Visit site
Nothing wrong with cheap gear. Morally should you buy from where who treats their staff like dirt?

I bought some Cleveland Wedges this week.

Shaft-made in China
Head - made in China
Assembled in China.

Is anything not produced by cheap labour these days?
 

Jimaroid

Journeyman Pro
Joined
May 15, 2014
Messages
3,734
Location
Fife
Visit site
Golf would be better off if people spent their money in the pro-shops around the country.

Sports Direct is a business that aims to extract maximum profit from the minimum outlay and quality. The only people that benefit from Sports Direct are the ones sat in the boardroom.
 

HomerJSimpson

Hall of Famer
Joined
Aug 6, 2007
Messages
73,206
Location
Bracknell - Berkshire
Visit site
As an introduction to golf and for those on a budget then it's fine. Not my preferred shop of choice but that's not to say it's bad. I wonder once the dust settles whether any of the Direct Golf franchises will reopen as Sports Direct "GOLF" or similar name and get back to selling some of the other well known brands
 

Jimaroid

Journeyman Pro
Joined
May 15, 2014
Messages
3,734
Location
Fife
Visit site
Craigg said:
​Why?

Because pro-shops provide an expert service by golfers for golfers. Sports Direct is a publicly traded company that exists only to deliver profits to shareholders.

Craigg said:
And the consumer perhaps?

If said consumer is happy buying a £2 product that's been marked up to £50 and then "discounted" to £20, they're welcome to carry on. But I don't see that as a benefit to consumers.
 

Craigg

Q-School Graduate
Joined
Dec 31, 2014
Messages
941
Visit site
Because pro-shops provide an expert service by golfers for golfers. Sports Direct is a publicly traded company that exists only to deliver profits to shareholders.

And again, I'll ask why golf would be better off?

If said consumer is happy buying a £2 product that's been marked up to £50 and then "discounted" to £20, they're welcome to carry on. But I don't see that as a benefit to consumers.

Where on earth did you pluck those figures from? And isn't that what all businesses try to do, pro shops included?

....
 

GreiginFife

Money List Winner
Joined
Mar 7, 2012
Messages
10,847
Location
Dunfermline, Fife
Visit site

Not sure if you are being totally serious there but Jim has it bob on. Buying from your pro keeps the money in your club and by proxy in the game of golf so the game benefits. Sports Direct on the other hand, that money will never be reintroduced to the game unless fat boy Ashley pays a green fee somewhere.

On the second point, apples and bananas really. For most product SD is the manufacturer and supplier and effectively "sets the rate" so manufacture of a polo, say, that is £2 or £3 that they put a MRRP (as I believe they are obliged to do) of say £24.99 and then sell at £14.99 making it seem like a bargain to the consumer while making a big profit.
Proshop will need to buy at cost and then mark up to make a margin which will probably be a lot less. Yes you are right they both need to make a profit, the flexibility that SD has compared to a pro shop is night and day.
Example is my proshop has a Footjoy polo at £32.99, he buys them in at cost which is £25.90. So nowhere near what SD can do.
 

Jimaroid

Journeyman Pro
Joined
May 15, 2014
Messages
3,734
Location
Fife
Visit site
The numbers are irrelevant, it's hyperbole and conjecture to illustrate an opinion in response to a question that can't be answered definitively.

My belief is that consumers get the best deal when they receive a product or service that is of a well defined quality from a knowledgeable person who has been trained to do their job. There is a term for this, it's called professionalism, and golf has an excellent system of professional training and qualification in place that aims to serve the sport and its participants. What would benefit golf the most would be for this system to stay buoyant.

Sports Direct has little interest in that system but they are interested in selling cheap tat for as much as they can get away with.
 

SugarPenguin

Challenge Tour Pro
Joined
Jan 17, 2015
Messages
738
Location
Doncaster
Visit site
People like cheap and love feeling as if they are getting a bargain.
If it grows the game then I'm all for it. Branded addidas and nike clothing are always cheaper at sports direct then pretty much anywhere else
too many snobs !
 

Fish

Well-known member
Banned
Joined
Jun 25, 2012
Messages
18,384
Visit site
Ok ok, I admit it, I went into SD a few weeks ago for a mooch as its across the road from my bank in town and bought 2 Srixon gloves as they were half price, forgive me father, I have clearly sinned :(
 
D

Deleted member 15717

Guest
The numbers are irrelevant, it's hyperbole and conjecture to illustrate an opinion in response to a question that can't be answered definitively.

My belief is that consumers get the best deal when they receive a product or service that is of a well defined quality from a knowledgeable person who has been trained to do their job. There is a term for this, it's called professionalism, and golf has an excellent system of professional training and qualification in place that aims to serve the sport and its participants. What would benefit golf the most would be for this system to stay buoyant.

Sports Direct has little interest in that system but they are interested in selling cheap tat for as much as they can get away with.

That might be the case with clubs, but for clothing/footwear/accessories, I don't need 'a professional' to tell me what is best for me. I know my sizing etc. If SD/DG are selling the same items cheaper, then I have no issues with purchasing from them.

Typical example is a Nike shirt that I really wanted. Any pro-shop that did have it, was selling it for £40. SD were selling it for £25. No brainier where I bought it from. They don't just sell the 'cheap' tat that you mention...they sell other brands too, and coupled with a quick dispatch and delivery, there isn't much to lose
 
Top