G
guest100718
Guest
Who else's fault could they have been?
Who else's fault could they have been?
Who else's fault could they have been?
for hooks and slices google ball flight laws
tops are mainly a rooky error, but we all hit the odd skinny one and it has nothing to do with shaft length
A sky is just one of things that happen to us all
Lie angle can affect toe up/down and impact meaning the face will be closed or more open, but most of bad shots you see will not benfit from a club fitting.
If i had to choose betrween being given a 2nd hand set from a forummer but I could practice as much as I liked vs 10 grand to spend on an uber fititng but limtied to 1 practice session a week, i know what i'd choose
10 grand for a CF, I'm sure PXG won't even charge that.
I stand by what I wrote earlier having done CF for a few years now. Seen many a 6ft5 or so guy walk in with a standard length set who hit many thins/tops, amazing what an extra inch can do (oooh matron).
Lie angle is crucial, you can have a great swing but if your lie angle is off you won't get the benefits of it.
If you don't believe in CF then are you saying that a 6ft6 25 year old guy playing off 2 should buy the same set as a 5ft4 55 year old off 23 straight off the shelf?
Go for it. My clubs are custom fit. I just think the benefit if any is massively over stated
I think its more like "why would you not have the thing that fits you.
In their defence, I feel club fitters are not out and out conscious frauds, but are as deluded as their customers and do believe they are selling a genuine solution - despite no evidence to back it up.
I think thats where the mistake is. It seems like a sensible statement. But relies on 1) there existing a definition of what fits you, golf club wise, and 2) even if there is such a thing, and you had it, that it would confer any benefit to your play.
At the moment, there is evidence for neither.
The snake oil reference of the OP is very apt : it is the selling of a solution without any proof that the solution has any clear benefit or proof of being effective; involves a "well, at least try it and see for yourself" type sales pitch, aimed towards making the sale rather than justifying the claims for it; has a "is not the full solution, and may not help in all cases" type get out to ensure against those who will claim they gained no benefit; is sold by what can genuinely be termed 'quacks', who have no particular scientific, or real understanding of what they are trying to sell, and are just jumping on a bandwagon; doesnt really cost that much for a single 'dose' so is unlikely to be chased for allegations of fraud or non-delivery; has an element of the mysterious or dazzle of science (a power of computer and measurement technology, the equivalent of the magic potion and ingredients of the snake oil concoction).
In their defence, I feel club fitters are not out and out conscious frauds, but are as deluded as their customers and do believe they are selling a genuine solution - despite no evidence to back it up.
I think your not using the right people......
"Ahhh, you mustnt be using the right snake oil.....what you need is that one"
Remind me... what is the first thing that happens when you arrive at your ski resort and you go to collect your ski hire... Oh ye, they measure you and give you ski`s that are the right size for you.. of and those polls, any will do wont they?
Oh I get it now.... your right, good point well made... Ill just pick something generic up, it will be just as good... all us humans are the same size and create the same speed and the like... I am glad your here to have made such well thought out points and so eloquently... Your a fine addition to the forum and I shall stop thinking for myself and just ask you going forwards... dumbass....
Me personally would need to learn to ski first. And good to see another stupid analogy.