D
Deleted Member 1156
Guest
Yes, in my opinion which is a FACT.In your opinion.
Yes, in my opinion which is a FACT.In your opinion.
Seeing as I copied that from you I guess that makes you a queenYes princess.
🤣
£150 was the first prize. The total prizes paid out were £450. Extra greenkeeping staff for extra work on the course which we do for our Opens and extra gardeners and flowers for the surrounding areas. This is above a normal Sunday as it was on a Sunday.
Also to be frank if we didn't run the Open and opened it up to visitors and societies it could be argued income would be greater.
There seem to be plenty different views on the subject.
Why shouldn't he defend their club?Why would you pay extra green keeping staff? Are you "cheating" your membership by providing a better course for visitors than for members?
It would only be better if you had a party booked for that day and let's be honest you didn't have a party booked for that day or you wouldn't have held an open.
Personally I think you should have let sleeping dogs lie now you're firefighting.
£150 was the first prize. The total prizes paid out were £450. Extra greenkeeping staff for extra work on the course which we do for our Opens and extra gardeners and flowers for the surrounding areas. This is above a normal Sunday as it was on a Sunday.
Also to be frank if we didn't run the Open and opened it up to visitors and societies it could be argued income would be greater.
There seem to be plenty different views on the subject.
Last month myself and two others played in a tri am open at Buchanan Castle. We teed off at 12:10 and we’re told we were match 40 and the day had been a sell out. Cost was £30 a team which was great value for a days competitive golf. Turned out we went and won the thing- when we handed our card over I noticed that there were 56 teams written up on a whiteboard. A prize pool of £1680. We received our vouchers about 8 days later- a measly £50 each. One of the team left a comment on their Facebook page venting about the amount ( it was removed and he has subsequently been blocked) and their pro phoned him and said that the club had induced extra costs due to it being an open and had deducted this from the prize pool ( they had to bring in green staff )
Also the results they posted only had 37 teams when we knew for a fact that this wasn’t the case. I managed to get in touch with one of the guys who won the event last year and he confirmed that they received the same amount. They were told that the club could have sold those times to visitors so had to recoup their losses- they didn’t return to defend their title and we won’t be either.
Assuming the three places they paid out were on a 50/30/20 scale their total prize payout for the day was £300 - around 18%- daylight robbery - avoid this place like the plague
Why should he defend their club?
From where I'm sat it looks to me like they gave a pretty good and reasonable day for AMATEUR golfers, not professionals playing golf for a living.
I don't they think have anything to be ashamed of and have every right to defend themselves on a public forum after being slated.
Yep, sounds like the OP in this instancepeople go "pot hunting" not to go and play another course.
Each to their own I side with the OP on the prizes. After all some people go "pot hunting" not to go and play another course.
A few people have quoted about Opens needing extra work for the greenstaff. I'm not quite following that. What would be different to any other competition day?
From my experience of known 'pot hunters', they aint the most popular of people/golfers.
But as has already been said, each to their own and everyone has their own reasons for playing.
Why would you pay extra green keeping staff? Are you "cheating" your membership by providing a better course for visitors than for members?
A few people have quoted about Opens needing extra work for the greenstaff. I'm not quite following that. What would be different to any other competition day?