Britains Most Influential Women

Doon I’ll ask you again

Can you tell me what it is exactly that she has done that has changed the landscape of GB , what it is that she has achieved that will be remembered in history and what it is that makes her the most influential women in GB in history

Can you show that just to prove this is nothing but a hijacked on line poll
 
Doon I’ll ask you again

Can you tell me what it is exactly that she has done that has changed the landscape of GB , what it is that she has achieved that will be remembered in history and what it is that makes her the most influential women in GB in history

Can you show that just to prove this is nothing but a hijacked on line poll

If you need telling, you really don't get it do you.
There is a clue in the threads title.
In a few years time there may not be a 'GB' as we know it.
 
If you need telling, you really don't get it do you.
There is a clue in the threads title.
In a few years time there may not be a 'GB' as we know it.
In that case Sturgeon and any of the SNP cant be counted as. if you have your's and their way, Scotlamd will be divorced from the rest of us so they will be Scotlands influential women and nothing to do with GB
 
If you need telling, you really don't get it do you.
There is a clue in the threads title.
In a few years time there may not be a 'GB' as we know it.
Doon you avoiding answering a direct question proves the point perfectly

The title says Britain Most Influential Women - tell me why Doon - stop hiding behind little snippets and non commits - it’s just one question that I’m sure for someone who appears to be very pro her will no doubt be able to give a very valid answer - or are you just words
 
If you need telling, you really don't get it do you.
There is a clue in the threads title.
In a few years time there may not be a 'GB' as we know it.

But she hasn’t done it yet. It’s what ifs and maybe’s. She is a commensurate politician, and certainly in the top 3 for most accomplished on the day but in terms of yesterday’s and tomorrow’s she’s a nobody. I’d rate Mhairi Black above her by some tune, and she’s only being doing it for 5 minutes.

As for not seeing the likes of Emmilene Pankhurst at number 1, what a disappointing indictment that she isn’t up there. Did so much that is now taken for granted.
 
In that case Sturgeon and any of the SNP cant be counted as. if you have your's and their way, Scotlamd will be divorced from the rest of us so they will be Scotlands influential women and nothing to do with GB

My god you are entering Liverpoolphil levels of 'doh' there.
Perhaps you need to read back what you have just written.:lol:
 
But she hasn’t done it yet. It’s what ifs and maybe’s. She is a commensurate politician, and certainly in the top 3 for most accomplished on the day but in terms of yesterday’s and tomorrow’s she’s a nobody. I’d rate Mhairi Black above her by some tune, and she’s only being doing it for 5 minutes.

As for not seeing the likes of Emmilene Pankhurst at number 1, what a disappointing indictment that she isn’t up there. Did so much that is now taken for granted.

Yup EP would have been my choice...
 
Though the truth is that all this slagging off of Sturgeon is predicated on the basis that the SNP hijacked the vote...consider - just maybe they didn't...
 
My god you are entering Liverpoolphil levels of 'doh' there.
Perhaps you need to read back what you have just written.:lol:

And you seem to be avoiding the question Doon -you seem to be pretty good at that , seems you lack conviction in your own opinion
 
Though the truth is that all this slagging off of Sturgeon is predicated on the basis that the SNP hijacked the vote...consider - just maybe they didn't...

As a poll, I'm not bothered either way. But, truthfully, does anyone think that the likes of Emily Pankhurst should be behind Sturgeon? Don't they teach history at school anymore?
 
As a poll, I'm not bothered either way. But, truthfully, does anyone think that the likes of Emily Pankhurst should be behind Sturgeon? Don't they teach history at school anymore?

That's not a bad point in fairness, but then second is the queen, the ****ing queen, a benefits sponger that doesnt actually do anything.

Against your politician point tho, is that Sturgeon is an outstanding principled operator, especially up against her contemporaries, May, Rooth, Dugdale, Abbott, McVey, Subery, that's where she really shows how good she is, and that even with a 100% hostile media, no running to the BBC for a soft interview for her.
 
That's not a bad point in fairness, but then second is the queen, the ****ing queen, a benefits sponger that doesnt actually do anything.

Against your politician point tho, is that Sturgeon is an outstanding principled operator, especially up against her contemporaries, May, Rooth, Dugdale, Abbott, McVey, Subery, that's where she really shows how good she is, and that even with a 100% hostile media, no running to the BBC for a soft interview for her.

:rofl:
 
That's not a bad point in fairness, but then second is the queen, the ****ing queen, a benefits sponger that doesnt actually do anything.

Against your politician point tho, is that Sturgeon is an outstanding principled operator, especially up against her contemporaries, May, Rooth, Dugdale, Abbott, McVey, Subery, that's where she really shows how good she is, and that even with a 100% hostile media, no running to the BBC for a soft interview for her.

The Queen, a benefits sponger? She pays more in income tax and corporation tax than you or I would in a 1000 lifetimes. Drop the blinkers and do a smidge of research into what she receives as the Sovereign Grant and what she pays in tax. Add to that she also pays council tax and utility bills too.

Granted 30 years ago she didn’t pay her way but she now returns more than she receives, even though as the law stands she doesn’t have to. Charles also pays the above taxes and bills even though he doesn’t have..... but that doesn’t suit those who are anti royal.
 
Genuinely surprised to see the very low turn out in Edinburgh for the very well publicised and staged PR visit of Harry and Megan.
2-300 at the most. It made the castle esplanade look deserted and the rows of crash barriers looked quite farcical.

With the Duke of Rothesay soon to become Charles 111, I wonder how he will be supported.
I like Charles, he seems to have a good grip of what is current in the UK and is not afraid to speak his mind.
He may surprise many.
 
That's not a bad point in fairness, but then second is the queen, the ****ing queen, a benefits sponger that doesnt actually do anything.

Against your politician point tho, is that Sturgeon is an outstanding principled operator, especially up against her contemporaries, May, Rooth, Dugdale, Abbott, McVey, Subery, that's where she really shows how good she is, and that even with a 100% hostile media, no running to the BBC for a soft interview for her.

Does everything have to be reduced to a profit and loss account?
 
As a poll, I'm not bothered either way. But, truthfully, does anyone think that the likes of Emily Pankhurst should be behind Sturgeon? Don't they teach history at school anymore?

Of course they shouldn't - mind you hopefully more will now be more aware of Emmeline Pankhurst as we have recently had the anniversary - btw - the film Suffragette (2105) was I thought very good and taught me a lot I actually didn't know - specifically about how very positive their positive action actually was.
 
Top