Old Skier
Tour Winner
But there was an agreement that there would be no major changes on trade and travel until Dec 2020.No there’s only the original dogs dinner deal on the table as the EU won’t renegotiate
But there was an agreement that there would be no major changes on trade and travel until Dec 2020.No there’s only the original dogs dinner deal on the table as the EU won’t renegotiate
Compare and Contract Mark Rutte (Netherlands PM) interview on BBC this morning with Dave Davies (ex Brexit Sec and A.B.deP supporter) interview on LBC (both actually worth a listen).
Mark Rutte - frankly and seriously setting out an EU stance - Hard Brexit means Hard Brexit plus no changes to the WA but possible changes to side agreement if UK alters position on one or more of May's Red Lines - and expressing great disappointment we are leaving, but confusion and frankly disbelief over what UK really now wants out of negotiations and what UK expects to be able to achieve after a No Deal Brexit as a country of 65m as opposed to being part of a grouping of 500m (well he would wouldn't he)
Dave Davies - breezy insouciance and optimistic assertions about same - on basis of what those such as Rutte say is all part of the EU's Project Fear; and that big business and financial services organisations will obviously be against a No Deal exit because they are only interested in this and next years results - not the glittering prizes out there for future business and us all.
Just as well we have such such as Davies supporting A.B.deP candidature for PM as we all look to said candidate entering the negotiations and taking us out on 31/10. And even although A.B.deP didn't say as much in the last debate - Davies tells us the A.B.deP will be taking the UK out of the EU on the 31/10 - and not one day later. That's the sort of firm leadership and straight speaking we need.
Rutte spoke a lot of sense, and a fair bit of rubbish. Add in the political posturing and what do you have? He's still right, in my eyes, in terms of is Brexit good or bad but beyond that its mainly waffle.
But here's a thought on one of his points, that of how big the EU is compared to the UK. There are only 5 net contributors to the EU, and some of those contribute next to nothing. In terms of what the others add to the whole concept, very little but they take plenty. Whilst Germany, France, Italy and Ireland try and balance the 14% loss of budget that the other 23 countries have said they won't contribute to or take less from, and from a budget that is supposed to be increasing above the GDP growth of the EU 27.
One of the predictions is it will push Ireland seriously into recession. Add all the other countries that are on the cusp of recession... The Germany's and France's won't suffer much but if they are expecting any help in the other countries.... The UK will suffer but if you think the majority of the EU will be in a position to make life difficult for the UK, or ease the burden on the EU budget you are deluded.
Mmmm New Brexit Party MEPs getting banned for filming the lobster lunches and Mercs coming their way....watch this space
Strange, BBC showing 11 with another in the pipeline.From Twitter...
Since the #Brexit vote, the EU has agreed trade deals with:
1. Canada
2. Japan
3. Brazil
4. Argentina
5. Paraguay
6. Uruguay
7. Vietnam
That = 500,000,000 people.
Since the Brexit vote, Britain has agreed trade deals with:
1. The Faroe Islands
That = 50k people
From Twitter...
Since the #Brexit vote, the EU has agreed trade deals with:
1. Canada
2. Japan
3. Brazil
4. Argentina
5. Paraguay
6. Uruguay
7. Vietnam
That = 500,000,000 people.
Since the Brexit vote, Britain has agreed trade deals with:
1. The Faroe Islands
That = 50k people
He's quoted countries that are grouped together and if he reads the BBC link will notice that the same has happened in the U.K. negotiations.And the reason they won’t agree one with the UK?
And the reason they won’t agree one with the UK?
Is that a handful Tory MP's failed to endorse PM May's deal.
Is that the right answer.![]()
We can't agree any deal whilst still a member of the EU. It's a non argument.And the reason they won’t agree one with the UK?
Have another guess.
We can't agree any deal whilst still a member of the EU. It's a non argument.
They said they will not talk trade until the first phase has been agreed. TM agreed to that. I believe David Davies was very anti this decision as Brexit secretary.I was asking why the E.U. will not do a deal with us.
Or Michel, the UK could leave with no deal agreed and it will be carnage for all parties. Great negotiation ðŸ‘Here’s a clue....
In 2016, Michel Barnier said: “I’ll have done my job, if, in the end, the deal is so tough on the British that they’d prefer to stay in the EU.â€