SocketRocket
Ryder Cup Winner
I agree
I agree
Can anyone explain why the vote of the new young voters [after 2016] is massively in favour of staying.
BTW I still think it was poor form not to allow 16 year olds a vote in the referendum.
I wouldn't allow anyone under the age of 21 to vote.
Can I ask why ? If someone can join the Army and defend your rights why can’t they vote ?I wouldn't allow anyone under the age of 21 to vote.
I wouldn't allow anyone under the age of 21 to vote.
Can I ask why ? If someone can join the Army and defend your rights why can’t they vote ?
Why?
PS.... Like others before you, why did make a comment on my post yet fail to answer the question posed.
Of course.
I just don't think, that at the current voting age, many voters have sufficient life experience to make a reasoned decision as to who/what they would be voting for.
I totally understand that some have, and that some over the voting age haven't, but a line has to be drawn somewhere, and for me that would be at 21 as a minimum.
I'm not sure why you brought the Army into it, I don't think it's relevant at all.
Unbelievable
Of course.
I just don't think, that at the current voting age, many voters have sufficient life experience to make a reasoned decision as to who/what they would be voting for.
I totally understand that some have, and that some over the voting age haven't, but a line has to be drawn somewhere, and for me that would be at 21 as a minimum.
I'm not sure why you brought the Army into it, I don't think it's relevant at all.
And the Army was relevant because if people at 16 are deemed to be mature enough to carry live weapons and defend the nation then they should be entitled to have a say on who runs the country
I wouldn’t allow anyone over 50 to vote!I wouldn't allow anyone under the age of 21 to vote.
There are people in the 30’s who don’t understand what or who they are voting for , there are people who just vote the same way every time regardless , there are people that vote on someone’s looks
Schools teach politics so it very likely that kids leaving school at 16 know a lot more than a lot of people
And the Army was relevant because if people at 16 are deemed to be mature enough to carry live weapons and defend the nation then they should be entitled to have a say on who runs the country
It’s like saying that who have retired shouldn’t have a say about the EU because it’s likelt any change won’t affect them in future life
Instead of just blurting out stuff like that how about you explain why you disagree with his point of view
How do you know all teachers are lefties?Impressional Kids get the opinion of very left wing teachers at school which they take as gospel...That’s hardly education. More like brainwashing!
In my house we have lively (and enjoyable) debates at the Sunday lunch table with my 17 and 14 year old sons.
How do you know all teachers are lefties?
Any proof?
It’s a while since I was at school, but I can’t remember any teachers expressing their political views- even when studying political history!Plenty but as I’m 52 you probably wouldn’t accept it.ðŸ‘
It’s a while since I was at school, but I can’t remember any teachers expressing their political views- even when studying political history!
It’s a while since I was at school, but I can’t remember any teachers expressing their political views- even when studying political history!
Yes, I am sure everyone who has had to live in a undemocratic country thought that things that happen there are a tad over dramatic. This stuff isn’t myth. It happened and is happening now. But if you want to play with fire for the sake of letting others interfere with the running of your country, crack on.The comparisons are a touch over dramatic- if there is to be any change on Art 50 and a change of thinking then I suspect there will be a second democratic vote of some sort. So democracy will still continue
Sounds like you're the one with Alzheimer's...
We didn’t do any current politics when I was st schoolSounds like you're the one with Alzheimer's...