PhilTheFragger
Provider of Entertainment for the Golfing Gods 🙄
Can we start a separate thread for that or would that be frowned upon?
Its been done already
Didn’t end well
Can we start a separate thread for that or would that be frowned upon?
It has been previously. I'm pleased to say rugby fans ignored the objections last time and will likely do the same now as well. Especially so as there is no rugby at the moment, the objections are effectively being fired at a blank space. A song is not owned by any one group, anyone can sing it.So now Swing Low is in the firing line.
Swing low has always been a bit dodgy, IMO.So now Swing Low is in the firing line.
And it’s terrible!!!Swing low has always been a bit dodgy, IMO.
Think it started because of Chris Oti.
I don't think they are going to repair it. It'll be put on display in a museum that will tell the story of Colston, slavery, Bristol, up to and including what happened to the statue and why. Fixing it and removing the graffiti would be erasing our history, wouldn't it?
Dont know about that, always seemed OK on the rugby tour coach after a good match along with those hand gestures.And it’s terrible!!!
Ties around your head, trousers around your ankles ?Dont know about that, always seemed OK on the rugby tour coach after a good match along with those hand gestures.
I think Karen was referring, with either ironic or humourous intent, to the view that statues shouldn't be pulled down by random vigilantes as they can teach us about our past.So I can vandalise anything, and add grafiti to anything I want to, and it should be left there as it's history? Not sure about that. It would be a pretty ugly, damaged, and painted up world.
Good grammar elevates ones graffiti!Daubing a wall with "Kaz woz 'ere" on the other hand is probably not historic. Unless I ever amount to something, which looks less likely every day. Plus only I would use apostrophes in graffiti.
Daubing a wall with "Kaz woz 'ere" on the other hand is probably not historic. Unless I ever amount to something, which looks less likely every day. Plus only I would use apostrophes in graffiti.
Good grammar elevates ones graffiti!
I know it divides opinion but, like it or not, what happened to that statue was not simple vandalism. Erecting monuments to slavers is history but so is tearing them down.
Daubing a wall with "Kaz woz 'ere" on the other hand is probably not historic. Unless I ever amount to something, which looks less likely every day. Plus only I would use apostrophes in graffiti.
Shouldn't that be 'shouldn't that be'Should that not be "one's graffiti"?
Jumpers for goal posts.(apologies in advance if the Fast Show is now 'persona non gratis')Ties around your head, trousers around your ankles ?
Shouldn't that be 'shouldn't that be'
LOL. Definitely.Should that not be "one's graffiti"?