Believe it’s been well known that he has suffered from depression and mental health issues in the past and has been very vocal about it .
People made the same point towards Caroline Flack
Wasn’t aware he’d had issues in the past Phil.
Believe it’s been well known that he has suffered from depression and mental health issues in the past and has been very vocal about it .
People made the same point towards Caroline Flack
Wasn’t aware he’d had issues in the past Phil.
To be precise…the statement from his wife said that she was making the statement on behalf of her husband…’outing’ suggests that she was doing it behind his back or against his wishes.No crime may have been committed but the damage is done, the wife has outed him.
Will be another Phillip Scofield, nothing illegal but career over
I was going to say the same thing. It’s very possibly his mental health issues caused him to make some poor choices.To be precise…the statement from his wife said that she was making the statement on behalf of her husband…’outing’ suggests that she was doing it behind his back or against his wishes.
I actually find the whole thing very sad…serious mental health issues such as Huw Edwards has suffered for years, can really screw up your thinking and make the most outrageous or inappropriate behaviour seem perfectly logical and reasonable.
If, and I use the term if very loosely, Huw did have mental health problems then the BBC have a lot to answer for. They have a duty of care for all their employees. He should have been taken off air a long time ago.To be precise…the statement from his wife said that she was making the statement on behalf of her husband…’outing’ suggests that she was doing it behind his back or against his wishes.
I actually find the whole thing very sad…serious mental health issues such as Huw Edwards has suffered for years, can really screw up your thinking and make the most outrageous or inappropriate behaviour seem perfectly logical and reasonable.
Not necessarily. If he was able to function at work, he was, then why would they remove him? For all we know, work may have been a release for him. I think a fear for people with mental health issues is that the moment an employer hears this then they treat them differently, they hold them back. You hope that he and the BBC talked about what he could and could not do and reacted accordingly. Had they suspended him they may have been open to being sued, it's a difficult line for employers to walk.If, and I use the term if very loosely, Huw did have mental health problems then the BBC have a lot to answer for. They have a duty of care for all their employees. He should have been taken off air a long time ago.
unfortunately this is another
“ Celeb” from a long line of celebs that have made wrong choices. People will talk and Gossip about Huw until the next name comes along.
I would suggest this is akin to the nasty kid dropping a stink bomb in a room, and walking away to leave everyone else to deal with it.Not necessarily. If he was able to function at work, he was, then why would they remove him? For all we know, work may have been a release for him. I think a fear for people with mental health issues is that the moment an employer hears this then they treat them differently, they hold them back. You hope that he and the BBC talked about what he could and could not do and reacted accordingly. Had they suspended him they may have been open to being sued, it's a difficult line for employers to walk.
As an outsider, this seems to not be work related, it is very much a private life issue.
The problem is that if he had mental health issues. He will, or can and did make the wrong decisions. He or anyone else with mental issues is not capable of making the right decisions.Not necessarily. If he was able to function at work, he was, then why would they remove him? For all we know, work may have been a release for him. I think a fear for people with mental health issues is that the moment an employer hears this then they treat them differently, they hold them back. You hope that he and the BBC talked about what he could and could not do and reacted accordingly. Had they suspended him they may have been open to being sued, it's a difficult line for employers to walk.
As an outsider, this seems to not be work related, it is very much a private life issue.
I understand he has suffered with depression for a very long time.The problem is that if he had mental health issues. He will, or can and did make the wrong decisions. He or anyone else with mental issues is not capable of making the right decisions.
Because he was not given help the problem is a lot bigger than it is now.
The problem is that if he had mental health issues. He will, or can and did make the wrong decisions. He or anyone else with mental issues is not capable of making the right decisions.
Because he was not given help the problem is a lot bigger than it is now.
Sounds like a great way to discriminate against people with mental health problems. Just stop them doing their jobs.If, and I use the term if very loosely, Huw did have mental health problems then the BBC have a lot to answer for. They have a duty of care for all their employees. He should have been taken off air a long time ago.
unfortunately this is another
“ Celeb” from a long line of celebs that have made wrong choices. People will talk and Gossip about Huw until the next name comes along.
i was scared of telling people (especially my boss) that i had MH issues but i noticed that it was taking me ages to do the simplest of tasks.And what you are posting is a big reason why so many still hide away from Mental illness and there is still a stigma associated with it
Talk of removing them from their jobs and not being capable of making decisions to etc is the sort of scaremongering that goes on and blanket judgments on mental health
He has had to deal with mental health illness for 20 years now and clearly has dealt with it well
This is all being driven by a scum paper that hasn’t even confirmed the source , provided evidence yet the police have confirmed nothing illegal has happened - yet he has been found guilty by social media
Even the suggestions that the mental health is just an excuse to try and get him out of it - the Scum paper is perfect for those type of people
I say If because if he did, then why was he still doing what he was doing. hence the BBC have a duty of care.I understand he has suffered with depression for a very long time.
Theres no "if" needed there.....
I don't think suffering from depression is a reason not to do a job, do you?I say If because if he did, then why was he still doing what he was doing. hence the BBC have a duty of care.
I say If because if he did, then why was he still doing what he was doing. hence the BBC have a duty of care.
He is but unfortunately his actions whilst being mentally Ill have had consequences for othershe's a news reader not a nuclear scientist
He is but unfortunately his actions whilst being mentally Ill have had consequences for others
He is but unfortunately his actions whilst being mentally Ill have had consequences for others
You’re really running with this backwards view on mental illness.