Tashyboy
Please don’t ask to see my tatts 👍
Cheers Paul me man ðŸ‘😘
Just read that, is it coincidence that the top three nigh on have the biggest stadiums in the prem .
Yes, match day income is peanuts in the grand scheme.
And make no mistake, City are only top because of the corrupt way they skirt around their ownership.
1st point, match day income is peanuts but it gets the tourists in and tourists just don't buy a ticket. If it is peanuts, why have City, Utd and Spurs increased the stadiums for peanuts. 20K plus fans for every game is a bit more than peanuts.
2nd point, corrupt Hmm, Karen Brady didn't think that last Saturday when she said that City have put in one Billion quid of there owners money into City, whilst at the same time Utds owners have taken out one Billion. As I have mentioned before, Citys oil money has put one Billion quid into a game that otherwise would not be there.
I never mentioned corruption, and i Dont know what you mean. But am willing to be “ enlightened “ ðŸ˜sorry tash but Karen Brady has zero ground to stand on when it comes to corruption
I never mentioned corruption, and i Dont know what you mean. But am willing to be “ enlightened “ ðŸ˜
Me 2 nd point corrupt was in response to Kelly saying City are corrupt. ðŸ‘are you on the sauce today?
"2nd point, corrupt Hmm, Karen Brady didn't think that last Saturday when she said that City have put in one Billion quid of there owners money into City, whilst at the same time Utds owners have taken out one Billion. As I have mentioned before, Citys oil money has put one Billion quid into a game that otherwise would not be there."
the word corrupt is in your post...
Me 2 nd point corrupt was in response to Kelly saying City are corrupt. ðŸ‘
Although you are encouraging. Ammon yhe sauce tonight. ðŸ˜
Karen doesn't work for free. Birmingham previously and now West Ham. Not just a salary, keep an eye out for consultancy fees or equivalent. She takes home a tasty sum.I think her point was. One is taking out and another putting in. Didn't know she had history as a taker. 😳
The good they have done for Manchester is undeniable. They're certainly a more desirable owner from a financial POV than the Glaziers.I think her point was. One is taking out and another putting in. Didn't know she had history as a taker. 😳
I think her point was. One is taking out and another putting in. Didn't know she had history as a taker. 😳
Come on tash I think everyone knows about our stadium.. she played a big part in that “deal†that costs the tax payer millions
Tory “lady†gets a deal off a Tory mayor that suits her employers and not the country .. hmmmm
The good they have done for Manchester is undeniable. They're certainly a more desirable owner from a financial POV than the Glaziers.
Does that counter the rumours of their behaviour back home? I'm not so sure.
Come on tash I think everyone knows about our stadium.. she played a big part in that “deal†that costs the tax payer millions
Tory “lady†gets a deal off a Tory mayor that suits her employers and not the country .. hmmmm
I thank Spurs every time I go over there.😂