And, we’re off.......2018/2019

Kellfire said:
Yes, match day income is peanuts in the grand scheme.

And make no mistake, City are only top because of the corrupt way they skirt around their ownership.
Click to expand...

1st point, match day income is peanuts but it gets the tourists in and tourists just don't buy a ticket. If it is peanuts, why have City, Utd and Spurs increased the stadiums for peanuts. 20K plus fans for every game is a bit more than peanuts.

2nd point, corrupt Hmm, Karen Brady didn't think that last Saturday when she said that City have put in one Billion quid of there owners money into City, whilst at the same time Utds owners have taken out one Billion. As I have mentioned before, Citys oil money has put one Billion quid into a game that otherwise would not be there.
 
Tashyboy said:
1st point, match day income is peanuts but it gets the tourists in and tourists just don't buy a ticket. If it is peanuts, why have City, Utd and Spurs increased the stadiums for peanuts. 20K plus fans for every game is a bit more than peanuts.

2nd point, corrupt Hmm, Karen Brady didn't think that last Saturday when she said that City have put in one Billion quid of there owners money into City, whilst at the same time Utds owners have taken out one Billion. As I have mentioned before, Citys oil money has put one Billion quid into a game that otherwise would not be there.
Click to expand...

sorry tash but Karen Brady has zero ground to stand on when it comes to corruption
 
Tashyboy said:
I never mentioned corruption, and i Dont know what you mean. But am willing to be “ enlightened “ 😁
Click to expand...

are you on the sauce today?

"2nd point, corrupt Hmm, Karen Brady didn't think that last Saturday when she said that City have put in one Billion quid of there owners money into City, whilst at the same time Utds owners have taken out one Billion. As I have mentioned before, Citys oil money has put one Billion quid into a game that otherwise would not be there."

the word corrupt is in your post...
 
pauljames87 said:
are you on the sauce today?

"2nd point, corrupt Hmm, Karen Brady didn't think that last Saturday when she said that City have put in one Billion quid of there owners money into City, whilst at the same time Utds owners have taken out one Billion. As I have mentioned before, Citys oil money has put one Billion quid into a game that otherwise would not be there."

the word corrupt is in your post...
Click to expand...
Me 2 nd point corrupt was in response to Kelly saying City are corrupt. 👍
Although you are encouraging. Ammon yhe sauce tonight. 😁
 
Tashyboy said:
Me 2 nd point corrupt was in response to Kelly saying City are corrupt. 👍
Although you are encouraging. Ammon yhe sauce tonight. 😁
Click to expand...

Yes tash but you were saying Karen was saying city are fine or something? She is the last person to comment on dodgy deals in football ..
 
I think her point was. One is taking out and another putting in. Didn't know she had history as a taker. 😳
 
Tashyboy said:
I think her point was. One is taking out and another putting in. Didn't know she had history as a taker. 😳
Click to expand...
Karen doesn't work for free. Birmingham previously and now West Ham. Not just a salary, keep an eye out for consultancy fees or equivalent. She takes home a tasty sum.

Just googled, an extra £438k on top of her £898k salary 🤔

The point she made is still a good one though.
 
Tashyboy said:
I think her point was. One is taking out and another putting in. Didn't know she had history as a taker. 😳
Click to expand...
The good they have done for Manchester is undeniable. They're certainly a more desirable owner from a financial POV than the Glaziers.

Does that counter the rumours of their behaviour back home? I'm not so sure.
 
Tashyboy said:
I think her point was. One is taking out and another putting in. Didn't know she had history as a taker. 😳
Click to expand...

Come on tash I think everyone knows about our stadium.. she played a big part in that “deal” that costs the tax payer millions

Tory “lady” gets a deal off a Tory mayor that suits her employers and not the country .. hmmmm
 
Let’s be honest you have both been given stadiums on the cheap whilst other clubs have had to earn a new or rebuilt stadium
 
Papas1982 said:
The good they have done for Manchester is undeniable. They're certainly a more desirable owner from a financial POV than the Glaziers.

Does that counter the rumours of their behaviour back home? I'm not so sure.
Click to expand...

Don't think there rumours Papas ☹️
 
pauljames87 said:
Come on tash I think everyone knows about our stadium.. she played a big part in that “deal” that costs the tax payer millions

Tory “lady” gets a deal off a Tory mayor that suits her employers and not the country .. hmmmm
Click to expand...

PJ 87, read a thing the other day about the stadium although being a fantastic athletics stadium it is Rammel for football. Is it 🤔
 
Wounded, bloody wounded. Just rung City up to see if they have any tickets for the FA cup final. I could of had three being a season ticket holder. But I forgot about ringing in on the day. The only tickets they have left are for club Wembley. £252.50p each. Eh £756.60p plus booking fees. The FA are the origanal shed robbers.

Look like watching City going for an Historic treble, possibly maybe on the flippin telly.

Rant over :mad:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Slab
RSVP
Replies
17
Views
3K
chico
chico
cookelad
And I’m Off 2018
Replies
10
Views
2K
richart
R
Don Barzini
Any employment law experts here? Apprenticeship question!
Replies
2
Views
1K
Hobbit
Hobbit
Curls
Staying in the here and now. I didn't realise this well-used phrase meant two different things.
Replies
18
Views
3K
r0wly86
R
C
Swing overhaul and handicap cuts ......
Replies
13
Views
2K
Carpfather1
C
Top