all bunkers declared GUR

jim8flog

Journeyman Pro
Joined
May 20, 2017
Messages
14,688
Location
Yeovil
Visit site
I know the pre WHS rule was that a course could not declare all bunkers as GUR and had to mark individual bunkers as such and play a qualifying comp.

The Rules of Handicapping make no such reference (they only refer to number of temporary greens and course length).

From the following publication it would appear that the England Golf allows scores for handicap purposes when all bunkers are out of play.

https://www.englandgolf.org/submitting-a-general-play-score-in-winter/

What do you think - qualifier or not and what do you base it upon?

I have suggested the club contact England Golf for clarification.
 
Last edited:
D

Deleted member 3432

Guest
Just shows how the game is getting 'dumbed down'.........

Only a few years away from allowing mulligans in my opinion.
 

Lord Tyrion

Money List Winner
Moderator
Joined
Sep 9, 2014
Messages
26,693
Location
Northumberland
Visit site
My previous club had real problems with its bunkers and we quite often had full GUR on bunkers. It makes the game so much easier as shots were risk free. You can aim at fairway bunkers, go straight at the cruelly placed green front bunker etc. Hit the green or fairway, great, if not then so what?

It's Mickey Mouse stuff if they allow rounds like that to count. That isn't based on golf snobbery, it's based on real experience.
 

jim8flog

Journeyman Pro
Joined
May 20, 2017
Messages
14,688
Location
Yeovil
Visit site
My previous club had real problems with its bunkers and we quite often had full GUR on bunkers. It makes the game so much easier as shots were risk free. You can aim at fairway bunkers, go straight at the cruelly placed green front bunker etc. Hit the green or fairway, great, if not then so what?

It's Mickey Mouse stuff if they allow rounds like that to count. That isn't based on golf snobbery, it's based on real experience.

Given the nearest point of relief with many of our bunkers I would sooner be playing out of them than playing from the side of them. Mind yesterday I did not go in to a single one.
Talking in the bar today about some of the stories about what some players think is the nearest point of relief leads one to wonder what goes on in medals generally.
 

SwingsitlikeHogan

Major Champion
Joined
Jul 24, 2012
Messages
32,219
Visit site
Anyone with a HI based upon 8 rounds containing a few or more where all bunkers are GUR will, I suggest, have an artificially low HI and will have difficulty playing to the CH of another track - or indeed their own.
 

rulefan

Tour Winner
Joined
Feb 21, 2013
Messages
14,484
Visit site
Anyone with a HI based upon 8 rounds containing a few or more where all bunkers are GUR will, I suggest, have an artificially low HI and will have difficulty playing to the CH of another track - or indeed their own.


A player may now take relief outside the bunker at the cost of a penalty stroke
The view of EG re all bunkers out of play is "There is no formal answer to this, from a Course Rating position it is unlikely to change the ratings so shouldn’t be an issue."
 

Steven Rules

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 18, 2022
Messages
556
Visit site
Given the nearest point of relief with many of our bunkers I would sooner be playing out of them than playing from the side of them.[t/QUOTE]
Me too!

Anyone with a HI based upon 8 rounds containing a few or more where all bunkers are GUR will, I suggest, have an artificially low HI and will have difficulty playing to the CH of another track - or indeed their own.
If it is the same 'easy' for everyone on the day then the PCC should reflect this and go some way to neutralising the lower than normal scores across the board.

Not a big issue in my opinion and the authorities seem to agree.

I know the pre WHS rule was that a course could not declare all bunkers as GUR and had to mark individual bunkers as such and play a qualifying comp.
The preamble to Model Local Rule F-16 (Bunker Filled with Temporary Water) still says:

The Committee should only use this Local Rule on a case-by-case basis and is not authorized to make a Local Rule providing generally that all flooded bunkers are ground under repair.
 

salfordlad

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 16, 2020
Messages
865
Visit site
As Steven Rules notes:
The preamble to Model Local Rule F-16 (Bunker Filled with Temporary Water) still says:

The Committee should only use this Local Rule on a case-by-case basis and is not authorized to make a Local Rule providing generally that all flooded bunkers are ground under repair.


Which sets up a fundamental clash of priorities for some clubs from time to time. The Committee is responsible for deciding what the golfing challenge on their course is, not the rules of golf. And many 'average' clubs struggle with maintaining bunkers in the condition that they need and were built for - so when weather and other maintainance priorities demand, many clubs just go "Bunkers are out of play". This may, but not necessarily, mean their scratch/slope ratings are inappropriate while this out of play period ensues. Personally, I think there are times when that is the better approach than the purely rules-focussed approach in the preamble to the MLR.
 

jim8flog

Journeyman Pro
Joined
May 20, 2017
Messages
14,688
Location
Yeovil
Visit site
As Steven Rules notes:
The preamble to Model Local Rule F-16 (Bunker Filled with Temporary Water) still says:

The Committee should only use this Local Rule on a case-by-case basis and is not authorized to make a Local Rule providing generally that all flooded bunkers are ground under repair.

.

As a club we were aware of this rule etc but the discussion within the club is really who is responsible for determining whether or not a competition is qualifying as the EG golf guide says cards can still be submitted when all bunkers are are GUR.

Added to that is the fact that the majority of bunkers were not actually flooded but looking like the side of a volcano where the heavy rains had created deep furrows when the rain had washed through them.

Probably like the majority of clubs we do not have the number of green staff available (or necessary number of signs) to be able to go out and inspect every bunker, coupled with the fact that early morning priority is given to mowing the greens.
 

wjemather

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 3, 2020
Messages
3,014
Location
Bristol
Visit site
I know the pre WHS rule was that a course could not declare all bunkers as GUR and had to mark individual bunkers as such and play a qualifying comp.

The Rules of Handicapping make no such reference (they only refer to number of temporary greens and course length).

From the following publication it would appear that the England Golf allows scores for handicap purposes when all bunkers are out of play.

https://www.englandgolf.org/submitting-a-general-play-score-in-winter/

What do you think - qualifier or not and what do you base it upon?

I have suggested the club contact England Golf for clarification.
There is no limit to the number of bunkers that may be taken out of play. As such, scores remain acceptable for handicapping and competition rounds are considered pre-registered (i.e. comps should not be made "non-qualifying"). The effect on resultant handicaps is negligible.
 

wjemather

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 3, 2020
Messages
3,014
Location
Bristol
Visit site
Anyone with a HI based upon 8 rounds containing a few or more where all bunkers are GUR will, I suggest, have an artificially low HI and will have difficulty playing to the CH of another track - or indeed their own.
This seems to be based on an assumption that taking relief from a bunker that is GUR affords an easier shot; however, the opposite is often the case.
 

Swango1980

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 22, 2019
Messages
10,642
Location
Lincolnshire
Visit site
There is no limit to the number of bunkers that may be taken out of play. As such, scores remain acceptable for handicapping and competition rounds are considered pre-registered (i.e. comps should not be made "non-qualifying"). The effect on resultant handicaps is negligible.
Does the course rating not partly take into account the location of bunkers? If so, if they are all out of play, how does that not have an impact on a players handicap. On the rare occasions that all bunkers were out of play at my old club, the game became so much easier off the tee.. 1st, 3rd, 4th, 8th, 9th, 10th, 11th, 12th, 13th and 17th holes all had bunker issues off the tee. Either they would be in my landing zone and make the fairway about 30-40% smaller, or I had to play a much shorter club and lay up short to avoid going in them at all. As soon as they were out of play, I could just open the shoulders and not worry, knowing I'd just get to drop out of them anyway. That is not to mention the impact of taking greenside bunkers out of play, where they can allow a player to play more aggressively at pins. I appreciate on occasion this might end up in a difficult dropping area if the player goes in them, although more generally it is my experience handicap golfers much rather play of grass than be in the bunker (hence the relief they often show when their ball just stops short of a bunker).

So, from a logical perspective, it is hard to see how having all bunkers GUR has a negligible impact on handicaps. If this was true, why have bunkers at all? Even if there is any justification whatsoever that dropping out of a greenside bunker gives a harder shot than from the bunker itself (and therefore we put this issue to one side), why have fairway bunkers?
 

woofers

Medal Winner
Joined
Feb 27, 2018
Messages
865
Visit site
The link to the England Golf website shown in the previous posts no longer works and I can't find any reference to the subject (if all bunkers are GUR can a score still count as qualifying?) elsewhere. Does anyone know of an official decision on this please?
 
Last edited:

rulefan

Tour Winner
Joined
Feb 21, 2013
Messages
14,484
Visit site
I believe that pre WHS, EG were the only authority to relate GUR bunkers with Qualifying scores. They specified that if over 50% were GUR the course was non-qualifying. That was a UDI ruling made by the then chair of EG Rules & Handicapping Committee. That is no longer the case.
 

Jules rules

New member
Joined
Aug 30, 2019
Messages
19
Visit site
Does anybody know when we were first allowed to declare all bunkers GUR and still be able to have a qualifying competition?
 
Last edited:

Default Golfer

New member
Joined
Jan 14, 2022
Messages
14
Visit site
I believe that the 2022 edition of EG's Winter Golf Checklist was the first not to require individual bunkers to be specifically marked as GUR. All bunkers on a hole can be GUR with the natural extension (confirmed by county) that all bunkers on a course can be GUR and scores still be acceptable for handicap.
 

rulefan

Tour Winner
Joined
Feb 21, 2013
Messages
14,484
Visit site
Post #17 is correct.
This is what it had to say:

Bunkers
Scores are still acceptable for handicap purposes when bunkers are taken out of play, having been individually marked as GUR. This would apply for situations such as severe or prolonged wet weather, or during maintenance work.
In situations where there are multiple bunkers that need to be designated GUR, it is acceptable to define them along the lines of ‘all greenside bunkers on Hole 4’ (or ‘all bunkers on Hole 4’)’, via a notice to players and without having to place GUR signs in all bunkers.
There is no limit on the number of bunkers that can be taken‘out of play’
 

D-S

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 31, 2020
Messages
2,984
Location
Bristol
Visit site
All that fuss when rating - measuring bunker proximity to green, distance from landing zones, checking depth of bunkers, seeing how much of the green they cover for the approach shot etc. etc. and if they are all out of play, irrespective if a course has 9 or 199 bunkers, then not only scores are acceptable but the slope & CR is unchanged.
I think Woodhall Spa is a touch easier with no bunkers in play and I am sure they are some of the main reasons for the Hotchkin having one of the highest slope ratings in the UK.
 

wjemather

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 3, 2020
Messages
3,014
Location
Bristol
Visit site
The 2021 winter checklist said similar:
"Providing a Local Rule is in place, bunkers may be taken out of play and marked as GUR for situations such as severe or prolonged wet weather. Bunkers flooded with water, can be marked as GUR; allowing scores to still be acceptable and returned for handicap purposes. Players must be made aware of which bunkers are GUR before play. There is no limit on the number of bunkers that can be taken ‘out of play’."
 
Top