Stub
Challenge Tour Pro
I'm sure this has probably been raised before but, if so, I missed it.
I play in a weekly roll-up in which handicaps are cut to 3/4 full handicap. As a relatively new player struggling to play consistently to 28 the loss of 7 strokes per round is significant, whereas someone off 12 loses only 3, albeit he would argue that still makes him struggle.
My beef is simple. If there is a system for compiling handicaps and reviewing them, why make arbitrary adjustments that seem to favour the lower handicap player?
I play in a weekly roll-up in which handicaps are cut to 3/4 full handicap. As a relatively new player struggling to play consistently to 28 the loss of 7 strokes per round is significant, whereas someone off 12 loses only 3, albeit he would argue that still makes him struggle.
My beef is simple. If there is a system for compiling handicaps and reviewing them, why make arbitrary adjustments that seem to favour the lower handicap player?