There is a fundamental difference between LFC, it's fans and other clubs. Not all other clubs but some that have been mentioned on here.
A friend of mine supports another PL club ( I won't mention which one) and we have had an argument about who the players play for.
For me as an LFC supporter our players play for the club, what the club stands for and for the fans. He maintains they don't, they play for the manager. I asked if the players play for the manager why have so many stayed after the manager has left and why do so many of them kiss the badge on their shirt when they score a goal? Why have Terry and Lampard (oops did I give it away!) not leave the club for far more lucrative deals when they had the chance?
You have the likes of City and Chavski who have spend ridiculous amounts of money on players but that is all they are, players but not a team. Both teams have far too many egos to be able to gel them as a fully functioning team.
Last year Aberdeen won the Scottish cup final and had 100,000 fans turn out for the teams parade of the cup. Chelsea won the CL and had 75,000 fans turn out to see their team with the most prestigious trophy in European club football. LFC had over 600,000 fans line the streets for our win in Istambul in 05 (and I was there!).
Why?
Because for most LFC fans it goes beyond just watching the game or buying a shirt we are one big family with a passion which in turn rubs off on the players who don't feel it's a right to wear the shirt but an honour to wear.
We have one of the best strikers in the world on current form who is more than happy to play a ball to a 19 year old hot shot to guarantee getting the goal rather than taking on every shot as if it's his right being a striker. The whole team play the same way with very few squabbles on the pitch and all the team put in a shift at each match. You rarely see that from the entire City or Chelsea squad.
i agreed with certain points, the fans celebrating in the streets is difficult for me to fathom. For a start, Liverpool are a bigger club, fan base certainly than Chelsea so I'd expect more fans to be there. Also, didn't the parade for Chelsea occur whilst the match going fans at least were still on route home due to scheduling in London for parade?
also, saints fc actually hold a record for the largest number of one set of fans at a match in the new wembley. St Johnstone a cup we room 44k. But I don't think that means we're the best fans ever, just it had been so long that we would take any trophy.
The he kissing the badge thing! Really? I've seen Alan Smith Kiss a Leeds badge followed by a Man U badge. That doesnt mean a thing to me I'm afraid.
The he point about Suarez, to be fair he'll put a shift in for anyone. His ability has certainly improved at lfc, but he plays as passionately for you as he does Uruguay and did Ajax. And would have arsenal or whoever if he'd left this year.
But it the bit I find strange is that you query Chelsea players commitment. I'm not gonna say their business model is the best of worst, that's for all to decide. But I've seen as much commitment in John Terry as I have in any lfc player.
Were they not commitment when they finally one the cl? Or when JT was knocked out in the little league cup?
this for me is what I'm talking about, Liverpool fc to the fans is the centre of their world. I get that, nothing wrong with that at all. But to think the players (homegrown aside) play for you for the same reasons doesn't wash. Granted there is an allure with your history, like there is for UTD. But to say that a player plays for you because of there love of the club, really?
What at does that say about any player that's ever left you? Were they faking their love whilst there?
How many times did Owen kiss the Liverpool badge, 100 times, 200 hundred times. Must of hurt to see him in a UTD shirt. How can a player, play for the club and all that then sign for the biggest rivals.
Probably because players play for titles not clubs......
Last edited: