rosecott
Money List Winner
Committee members I suppose.
And, of course, they are answerable to those who hired them.
Committee members I suppose.
So who markets the club to visitors, takes bookings from visitors and agents? Who manages the greens staff, who looks after the buying or hiring of equipment? Who decides on and manages these budgets etc etc.
You are fortunate to not spend much on running the club.we have a marketing committee, greens committee, bookings are taken by the honorary secretary, head greenkeeper and head of greens liaise on equipment, subject to budgets set at start of year.
Yep. That's how I used to describe the situation at my previous club. We were subscribers to the golf course rather than members and our "club" was essentially a society that ran lots of events there. The course and the club were totally separate entities.This is not as straightforward as it would sound. Private members clubs are generally seen as those who's course and club assets are owned by the members. Then you have propriety clubs where a private company or individual owns the course assets. Very often these have private members clubs operating from the course, as my previous club did. So "members" paid an annual subscription to play the course and a small fee to join the club, which enabled us to play for club teams and in competitions. The only assets we had were, cash trophies and the computer system that we ran the competitions from. Many municipal clubs operate that way. Some courses in Scotland have multiple clubs running from one course.
Not normally the case.Then you have council owned municipal clubs where the council own the course but rent the course for a club to play on it
So, no visitors then?This is not as straightforward as it would sound. Private members clubs are generally seen as those who's course and club assets are owned by the members. Then you have propriety clubs where a private company or individual owns the course assets. Very often these have private members clubs operating from the course, as my previous club did. So "members" paid an annual subscription to play the course and a small fee to join the club, which enabled us to play for club teams and in competitions. The only assets we had were, cash trophies and the computer system that we ran the competitions from. Many municipal clubs operate that way, but may also responsible for operating the bar & catering. . Some courses in Scotland have multiple clubs running from one course. I am guessing there are many variations around the world.
Pretty much the same as ours (also a members club).The members club where I play means that I am part of owner of the club but with a £1 share (limited liability).
In practice this only means I will get a share of it's value if the club is sold.
We have a Captains Committee which is responsible for any thing golf related, an unpaid board of directors (all members) for things financial and we have employed staff.
As members we get reserved tee times some times of the day and all day Saturday, discount on food and drink prices.
I think you are getting slightly confused, there are basically 3 types of club.So, no visitors then?
Not really been a member in golfing terms so I don’t speak from past experience
I always thought that members were all part of a group (the Membership) and in terms of a private golf club that it was The Membership (the group) that owned the club, not the members (individuals) I didn’t think there was any real sense of member ownership
I thought being a member of a private golf club meant you were primarily a custodian responsible for the condition of the club for its current and future members/visitors etc
No, non of these terms describe whether clubs allow visitors or not, purely the degree of ownership of the assets. Very few golf clubs in the UK don't allow any visitors, I would struggle to name half a dozen and non in the whole of the Midlands where I play most of my golf. In fact the only places I can think of are in the South East and Scotland.So, no visitors then?
So, no visitors then?
JCB ?No, non of these terms describe whether clubs allow visitors or not, purely the degree of ownership of the assets. Very few golf clubs in the UK don't allow any visitors, I would struggle to name half a dozen and non in the whole of the Midlands where I play most of my golf. In fact the only places I can think of are in the South East and Scotland.
Very much soHowever the number of clubs quoted here is vanishingly small versus the number of private (no guests without being a guest of a member) clubs in the US. I have heard that up to a third of clubs fit into this category. In relation we are very fortunate to have the access that we have.
Oh ye, JCB the exception that proves the ruleJCB ?
Don’t tbink you can book a tee time there as a visitor
There are a number down south
Bearwood
Queenwood
Wisley
Beaverbrook
Wentworth
Loch Lomond
Centurion
Skibo
Renaissance
Ardfin
They are the ones that I can think of that don’t allow someone to book a tee time as a visitor
Well - that's how I view being a member of a private members club...but a good number of members of my club might not see their membership in such a light.Not really been a member in golfing terms so I don’t speak from past experience
I always thought that members were all part of a group (the Membership) and in terms of a private golf club that it was The Membership (the group) that owned the club, not the members (individuals) I didn’t think there was any real sense of member ownership
I thought being a member of a private golf club meant you were primarily a custodian responsible for the condition of the club for its current and future members/visitors etc