Fromtherough
Assistant Pro
If your son had received the money at the time, would he have qualified for UC when he claimed the benefit? If not then he actually hasn’t lost out anything. The system is not ideal, but in place to support those that need it most. This boost in his income, even if only a one off, should be factored in and means the state shouldn’t need to support him for the period in which he receives it - not earns it.
To attempt to wait for this to blow over is more than a bit blasé. If you’re capable of working and you don’t try, suggests a lot about a person. A few of my self employed friends were diddled over the government support. One of them for cashing in a pension. He is a joiner and instead of claiming government support, went out and picked fruit, delivered takeaways and worked in a supermarket. He’s 56 and could have seen some of these as demeaning, but he didn’t. My respect for him went through the roof. Perhaps if your son had a similar ethic, he would be receiving this back pay and could view it as a bonus, rather than a restriction in his state funded benefit. That sounds a little harsh, but I think that is the actual reality of the situation.
To attempt to wait for this to blow over is more than a bit blasé. If you’re capable of working and you don’t try, suggests a lot about a person. A few of my self employed friends were diddled over the government support. One of them for cashing in a pension. He is a joiner and instead of claiming government support, went out and picked fruit, delivered takeaways and worked in a supermarket. He’s 56 and could have seen some of these as demeaning, but he didn’t. My respect for him went through the roof. Perhaps if your son had a similar ethic, he would be receiving this back pay and could view it as a bonus, rather than a restriction in his state funded benefit. That sounds a little harsh, but I think that is the actual reality of the situation.