Traitors UK 4 - probably spoilers

I’m not sure why the banished/murdered keep on thinking in the Uncloaked interview or reveal that there could be still 4 Traitors left or even more. They have caught 2, there has been no obvious seduction opportunities (they have chosen to murder instead) - did they think there were originally 6 ot more Traitors? The turret isn’t big enough.
 
Is it just too obvious that the last 2 into breakfast every time there is a murder must be faithful and must have been part of the 3 likely Traitor’s targets? Is seems to happen every time doesn't it?
 
Is it just too obvious that the last 2 into breakfast every time there is a murder must be faithful and must have been part of the 3 likely Traitor’s targets? Is seems to happen every time doesn't it?
There must be something else like some editing. They pointed this out a couple of years ago so all players should/will be aware of it.
I have no idea how they are doing it, but it must be something. Maybe they film ‘all’ variation after the show is over.
 
I am always suprised on how people come to there decisions on who they are voting out. A lot seems to be “ herd mentality” and people seem to vote on what has gone off in the previous 24 hours. It seems facts are irrelevant 😳
 
I am always suprised on how people come to there decisions on who they are voting out. A lot seems to be “ herd mentality” and people seem to vote on what has gone off in the previous 24 hours. It seems facts are irrelevant 😳
But the facts are explicitly shown to us, the viewers, and are edited in a particular way, such as close up on Stephen's face when he starts panicking. When you are in the castle, you may not be looking at a particular person at the right time or might not hear what someone says because you are listening to another person.
 
I am always suprised on how people come to there decisions on who they are voting out. A lot seems to be “ herd mentality” and people seem to vote on what has gone off in the previous 24 hours. It seems facts are irrelevant 😳
What facts have they got to go on, seems to me all they have is peoples reactions to events and they can be interpreted in all manor of ways. Perhaps those experts on here would like to apply for the next series and see how they get on.
 
But the facts are explicitly shown to us, the viewers, and are edited in a particular way, such as close up on Stephen's face when he starts panicking. When you are in the castle, you may not be looking at a particular person at the right time or might not hear what someone says because you are listening to another person.
That’s what I mean, the facts are there but, people don’t pick up on them. Even the traitors state I am under pressure, they know it. But then when it Comes to the nights voting. They don’t get a single vote. 😳
A lot of the voting it seems to me is because they don’t particularly get on with someone.
Rachel said the other night “ I was waiting to see who said the first thing tonight around the table, coz they are the traitor, and the traitor is you coz you spoke first”. Er the first person that spoke was Rachel because she said “ I am not talking first”. 😳 plank. But no one picked up on it. 🤔😳
 
What facts have they got to go on, seems to me all they have is peoples reactions to events and they can be interpreted in all manor of ways. Perhaps those experts on here would like to apply for the next series and see how they get on.
The term evidence is used very lightly in that show.

Harriet was right, but luck not evidence. Jessie had more evidence, but it was still 1 in 5 (or 4, depending on the pov) that Stephen was it, especially after Fiona got caught.
 
Top