They're here!!!!! New Shiney Alert!!!

Very nice. Never had brand new shineys but have made my second handeys look like new. Might have to have an evening in the shed to get them ready for this season.
 
Nice, but i still think the 64 and 62 are nicer. Wedges look great though, i would be tempted but for the fact the mp10 are hard to beat and i've got a spare of each.

Interested to find if there are any differences in distance between these and the 32 though.
 
Nice, but i still think the 64 and 62 are nicer. Wedges look great though, i would be tempted but for the fact the mp10 are hard to beat and i've got a spare of each.

Interested to find if there are any differences in distance between these and the 32 though.

See, I think the 62's and 64's look a little bland and middle of the road to my eye. If everyone thought the same about everything it would be a boring world eh?

Wedges are nice. Look very similar to the T10, same loft, bounce and shafts too so not too dissimilar.

At the fitting, the monitor gave broardly the same figures between the 2, with the 63's launching a few degrees higher. I'll report back after a month or so of gaming them. Once I've got used to them I'd be in a better position to give an opinion.
 
See, I think the 62's and 64's look a little bland and middle of the road to my eye. If everyone thought the same about everything it would be a boring world eh?

Wedges are nice. Look very similar to the T10, same loft, bounce and shafts too so not too dissimilar.

At the fitting, the monitor gave broardly the same figures between the 2, with the 63's launching a few degrees higher. I'll report back after a month or so of gaming them. Once I've got used to them I'd be in a better position to give an opinion.

I'm not supprised there is not much difference between the 63 and 32. For the look of it the 32 is such a forgiving club, the only difference being the heads of the 32 are lightly larger than my 62 and easier to hit, hence the reason i use the 32 over the winter.

Anyway, i'm selling all my mizuno stuff and getting Wilson Fatshafts instead;)
 
I'm not supprised there is not much difference between the 63 and 32. For the look of it the 32 is such a forgiving club, the only difference being the heads of the 32 are lightly larger than my 62 and easier to hit, hence the reason i use the 32 over the winter.

Anyway, i'm selling all my mizuno stuff and getting Wilson Fatshafts instead;)

The 32's are very forgiving for sure, but the 63's aint bad either.

I caught a few a little low on the face at my fitting and didn't the bone shuddering vibrations I got from the 32's.

With the 63's having a pocket cavity, they will probably be a little more forgiving than the 32's club for club, they certainly felt it and the 64's were exactly the same.

Re the Wilsons. You already hit them far enough :D
 
The 32's are very forgiving for sure, but the 63's aint bad either.

I caught a few a little low on the face at my fitting and didn't the bone shuddering vibrations I got from the 32's.

With the 63's having a pocket cavity, they will probably be a little more forgiving than the 32's club for club, they certainly felt it and the 64's were exactly the same.

Re the Wilsons. You already hit them far enough :D

With the Wilsons, i can get rid of most clubs in my bag, I'll only need 4 iron, 7, PW,a SW and putter.

got to be better that lugging 14 clubs around:)
 
tried the MP64's last night in a blind test, really not impressed, after a few hits I had to see what this rather thick top lined club was I was wielding- gutted to see it was the MP64.
I can see why Mizuno are offering a free MP650 driver with each set of 64's purchased.
I also didnt like the MP650, it sat well at address but the sound was poor IMO and the stock shaft just ok.

Right choice gareth getting the 63's imo :thup:
 
Top