The Masters 2026

I think it was an odd comment by Nantz. As a commentator you do your research and to state you haven't at this stage, odd. If you are that involved in golf, wouldn't you be looking at all possible contenders and knowing how they are playing?

I’d be very disappointed in a commentary that didn’t include history, current form guide and what club they’re playing from xx yards. I don’t need a description of the shot itself, I can see that as it’s played.

Surprised that someone like Nantz would be so unprofessional.

Edit; surely he’s been misquoted?
 
I’d be very disappointed in a commentary that didn’t include history, current form guide and what club they’re playing from xx yards. I don’t need a description of the shot itself, I can see that as it’s played.

Surprised that someone like Nantz would be so unprofessional.

Edit; surely he’s been misquoted?
I agree with you Brian but I wonder for all these commentators do they have a runner that provides all the stats they need and they just revise it the day before?

I would say knowledge of the course is probably the most important stat as they try and describe the shot before it’s played and if it is a fairly easy or more difficult shot.

I would imagine Augusta must be the easiest course to do this as it’s obviously played there every year and they must know it extremely well, as most of us do just from watching over the years.
 
I think it was an odd comment by Nantz. As a commentator you do your research and to state you haven't at this stage, odd. If you are that involved in golf, wouldn't you be looking at all possible contenders and knowing how they are playing?
This 100%, It's his job at the end of the day, I'd actually be embarrassed to come out and say that, shows a complete lack of professionalism.
 
I feel this is being a touch blown out of proportion because of the current circumstances

As a “host and commentator” does he really need to watch all the tours , I suspect he prob doesn’t watch all the PGAT events or ET events and certainly won’t be watching the events in the Far east or any of the Am’s

It’s such a non event blown up mainly because of who it is and the tour he is on
 
This 100%, It's his job at the end of the day, I'd actually be embarrassed to come out and say that, shows a complete lack of professionalism.
Or, like most of the golf watching population he doesn’t see any point in watching LIV events.

It will take him 2 seconds to search for the results. What more would he gain from watching?
 
I feel this is being a touch blown out of proportion because of the current circumstances

As a “host and commentator” does he really need to watch all the tours , I suspect he prob doesn’t watch all the PGAT events or ET events and certainly won’t be watching the events in the Far east or any of the Am’s

It’s such a non event blown up mainly because of who it is and the tour he is on
It’s exactly that. It’s the usual LIV bot attack on anyone who dares say anything other than LIV is magnificent 😂
 
Yet you're the one who brought it up?

Personally I've never heard of Jim Nantz and couldn't give a flying one if he's watched Bryson play or not. I haven't watched him either, apart from that one wood he hit out of a mudbath the other week, but I still know he's a very good golfer.

What did I bring up?
 
I feel this is being a touch blown out of proportion because of the current circumstances

As a “host and commentator” does he really need to watch all the tours , I suspect he prob doesn’t watch all the PGAT events or ET events and certainly won’t be watching the events in the Far east or any of the Am’s

It’s such a non event blown up mainly because of who it is and the tour he is on
Exactly this ☝️☝️

Nantz isn’t even really a commentator, he’s a broadcaster. You also don’t need to watch a player to know what form is like, a quick glance shows Bryson has 2 wins in a row, his shots gained stats etc are readily available and his distances are largely irrelevant as they’re readily available to broadcasters again through stats and the on course commentators following the groups feed that info back to studios and 9/10 it’s them who tells the viewer.
 
Have you gone senile? You brought up the story of Nantz not watching Bryson, which is obviously tantamount to saying he doesn't watch LIV events. But called others obsessed for responding in kind? Very odd statement.

Lol.

Bryson is one of the best golfers on the planet and highly placed amongst the bookies to do well at Augusta

Nantz hosts the main coverage.

He doesn’t have to watch a LIV event to see how Bryson is playing, but I’d expect him to have done a bit more research than ‘glimpses on You Tube with my kid’

Other people have brought up that he’s taking a pop at LIV mate, so go and pull them up in it. 👍
 
Lol.

Bryson is one of the best golfers on the planet and highly placed amongst the bookies to do well at Augusta

Nantz hosts the main coverage.

He doesn’t have to watch a LIV event to see how Bryson is playing, but I’d expect him to have done a bit more research than ‘glimpses on You Tube with my kid’

Other people have brought up that he’s taking a pop at LIV mate, so go and pull them up in it. 👍
Don't do the naive act, it makes you look silly. It was obviously a LIV point from the start, which is why you posted it.
 
Lol.

Bryson is one of the best golfers on the planet and highly placed amongst the bookies to do well at Augusta

Nantz hosts the main coverage.

He doesn’t have to watch a LIV event to see how Bryson is playing, but I’d expect him to have done a bit more research than ‘glimpses on You Tube with my kid’

Other people have brought up that he’s taking a pop at LIV mate, so go and pull them up in it. 👍

He hosts the coverage , he isn’t an analyst alongside a co commentator

He just hosts it

Should he research all the players

This really is a touch overreaction and we all know there is just one reason why you have brought it up
 
Top