The great drive for dough putt for show debate thread.

  • Thread starter Deleted member 29109
  • Start date
D

Deleted member 31467

Guest
Not true at all, I'm absolutely fine with the 'how' part. It's the doing I can't do. ;)
Trust me, if you want to lower your handicap by 1 shot you are much better spending your time working on 150 yards and in than trying to add 10 yards.
I lowered my handicap from 14 to 1 without gaining any yardage.
 

Backsticks

Assistant Pro
Banned
Joined
Aug 7, 2012
Messages
3,852
Visit site
Trust me, if you want to lower your handicap by 1 shot you are much better spending your time working on 150 yards and in than trying to add 10 yards.
I lowered my handicap from 14 to 1 without gaining any yardage.
In general, people know better than to trust extrapolations made from a sample size of one.
 
D

Deleted member 31467

Guest
Gains for the majority do not come from gym work, but through technique
Exactly the point I'm making. Better technique means more FIR, more GIR and fewer shots around the green. All can be done without gaining distance off the tee.
 

RichA

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 24, 2021
Messages
3,917
Location
UK
Visit site
Trust me, if you want to lower your handicap by 1 shot you are much better spending your time working on 150 yards and in than trying to add 10 yards.
I lowered my handicap from 14 to 1 without gaining any yardage.
Unless you're already pretty good inside 150 yards but your average drive on your course's 9 x 400ish yard par 4 holes always leaves you about 160-170 yards out.
One size doesn't fit all in golf. We're all different.
 

Springveldt

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 5, 2018
Messages
2,197
Visit site
Yeah I'm bumping this, but don't worry, I come bearing stats (courtesy of Crossfield).


It seems I was right then!


(If you can't be bothered watching the video, it basically says players who added 10 yards to their drive were 1.8 shots lower on average for their round. That's pretty significant in my book.)
And this is from someone who said for years that it was better to hit fairways than be long (probably because he played so much with Lockey).
 

Backsticks

Assistant Pro
Banned
Joined
Aug 7, 2012
Messages
3,852
Visit site
Exactly the point I'm making. Better technique means more FIR, more GIR and fewer shots around the green. All can be done without gaining distance off the tee.
Distance is a much bigger factor in good scoring, than FIR. FIR in itself does not lead to significant score improvement. Distance does.
 

Backsticks

Assistant Pro
Banned
Joined
Aug 7, 2012
Messages
3,852
Visit site
I
And this is from someone who said for years that it was better to hit fairways than be long (probably because he played so much with Lockey).
I think I heard him say that this is a big regret in golf. That had he known then, what he knows now due to advances in data collection, analysis, and speed and distance measurement, he would have known to strive for distance many years ago.
 

Orikoru

Tour Winner
Joined
Nov 1, 2016
Messages
27,792
Location
Watford
Visit site
And this is from someone who said for years that it was better to hit fairways than be long (probably because he played so much with Lockey).
I think I heard him say that this is a big regret in golf. That had he known then, what he knows now due to advances in data collection, analysis, and speed and distance measurement, he would have known to strive for distance many years ago.


I'm not his biggest fan or anything, but I do admire someone who's open to changing their mind based on new information. (y)
 

evemccc

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 28, 2020
Messages
1,639
Visit site
Distance is a much bigger factor in good scoring, than FIR. FIR in itself does not lead to significant score improvement. Distance does.


Is his / your reasoning because the closer you are to the hole, the easier the iron shot you have (Eg. 9i > 7i) for your approach?

Surely the corollary of that reasoning is that GIR is King….so irrespective of distance off the tee, if the average golfer spent time honing their second shot / approach play, and became proficient in iron play, they would hit more GIR and therefore score better..🤷🏻‍♂️

So, improved ‘distance off the tee’ is essentially shorthand for GIR — as long as GIR is reached, it doesn’t matter how the player gets there


*I appreciate it may be easier for a player to improve 10 yards than be better at hitting 6i / 7i second shots consistently
 
D

Deleted member 31467

Guest
Unless you're already pretty good inside 150 yards but your average drive on your course's 9 x 400ish yard par 4 holes always leaves you about 160-170 yards out.
One size doesn't fit all in golf. We're all different.
Indeed. So improve your technique and you'll hit fewer wayward shots.
 

Doon frae Troon

Ryder Cup Winner
Joined
Mar 5, 2012
Messages
19,031
Location
S W Scotland
Visit site
Re going to the gym to hit it further.
That ruined Jonny Miller.

The longest hitter I ever played with [pro rata] was Bobby Cole.
We were both 18 years old and the same build.
28'' waist, under 10 stone and 5'10.
I was not a short hitter [240 yard drives in 1960's] but he could outhit me by 30 yards.
No golfers ever went to the gym in those days.

Re OP
Remember the old golfing Gorilla joke.
 

Pants

Challenge Tour Pro
Joined
Sep 4, 2009
Messages
1,865
Visit site
One size doesn't fit all in golf. We're all different.
Indeed it doesn't and we all are. Even if I could wave a magic wand and gain 10/20 yds extra off the tee and approach shots, most decent par 4's and par 5's are out of reach for me in "regulation". Improvements to pitching, chipping and putting would reduce my h/cap. Think I'll give the gym a miss ;)
 
Top