AmandaJR
Money List Winner
No David Silva 
My very first thought on seeing thatNo David Silva![]()
These lists are so subjective and without knowing the requirements to rate players it’s difficult to argue for or against anyone.No David Silva![]()
Its Carragher picking it, so throw a dice for 2-10 as Gerrard was always going to be 1.These lists are so subjective and without knowing the requirements to rate players it’s difficult to argue for or against anyone.
No Claude Makelele. So good they named a position after him.
I dont know if Giggs counts as a forward/winger/midfielder but I would imagine he would be in everyone’s top 10 whatever position he was put in.
It's for central midfielders and Giggs certainly doesn't qualify there.These lists are so subjective and without knowing the requirements to rate players it’s difficult to argue for or against anyone.
No Claude Makelele. So good they named a position after him.
I dont know if Giggs counts as a forward/winger/midfielder but I would imagine he would be in everyone’s top 10 whatever position he was put in.
No chance for any of your lot then.It's for central midfielders and Giggs certainly doesn't qualify there.
Anyway, it's premier league era only![]()
Looks like on Monday nights they are doing top 10’s in Prem
Last night was midfielders
10. Fabregas
9. Rodri
8. Yaya Toure
7. Scholes
6. Kante
5. Lampard
4. Viera
3. De Bruyne
2. Keane
1. Gerrard
IMO I would move Scholes to 5 and then Lampard 6 and Kante 7
I actually enjoy Carragher doing these top 10 things on MNF, but last night before he started it, straight away I said Gerrard No1.There’s different strengths, weaknesses & styles to each player’s games, it’s difficult to create a 1-10 because of that. But hey, let’s give it a go.
At club level I find it very difficult to separate Gerrard & Lampard, similarly Keane & Viera. But, for me, out of that list De Bruyne is number 1. Scholes is underrated, similar in style to De Bruyne but lacking the first touch. I’d put him as high as 3/4. Gerrard & Lampard together at 2/3 - pushes Scholes to 4. Keane & Viera at 6/5.
I as never sold on Rodri. Could be outstanding for weeks, then nondescript for a while. Yaya was immense but is he good enough for 2nd or 8th? And I can’t see Fabregas in the top 10 ahead of David Silva.
To be honest, different days different opposition most of them would get player of the week.
There’s different strengths, weaknesses & styles to each player’s games, it’s difficult to create a 1-10 because of that. But hey, let’s give it a go.
At club level I find it very difficult to separate Gerrard & Lampard, similarly Keane & Viera. But, for me, out of that list De Bruyne is number 1. Scholes is underrated, similar in style to De Bruyne but lacking the first touch. I’d put him as high as 3/4. Gerrard & Lampard together at 2/3 - pushes Scholes to 4. Keane & Viera at 6/5.
I as never sold on Rodri. Could be outstanding for weeks, then nondescript for a while. Yaya was immense but is he good enough for 2nd or 8th? And I can’t see Fabregas in the top 10 ahead of David Silva.
To be honest, different days different opposition most of them would get player of the week.
There's no relegation battle anymore. There are two teams battling to survive and one team where the players simply don't care if they get relegated or not because they all think they're going to leave.But Spurs themselves are the least threatening of the 3 sides and haven't won a league game this year....and whilst they seem to be able to rise and put in performances against the big clubs, they have been utterly lacklustre when playing mid table teams and those fighting around them.
Forests downfall may potentially be their Europa league adventure.
I think the difficulty for Spurs might come if the gap stretches to 4 or 5 points in the next couple of rounds of fixtures...not that Spurs' fixtures are unwinnable on paper, just that the mental pressure of trying to make up that gap, even when playing supposedly weaker sides, might be too much.
There’s no doubt Gerrard was a fantastic player, but he was justifying his decision on his influence at the Club, with his team mates etc, well straight away that’s unfair as Carragher can’t do that with the others, so it shouldn’t be used as a criteria.
He goes on to say that in the year LPool nearly won the PL under Houlier, it wouldn’t of made a difference if you’d of swapped Gerrard for any other player in the top 10 that season, they still wouldn’t of won the league.
And that was one of his considerations.
He’d of got more compliments if he’d of been honest and said top 10 midfielders without Gerrard as I’m biased.
And our replies to your initial post are just opinions as well.It’s just his opinion at the end of the day , don’t expect he was looking for compliments- as with any “list” it’s always going to be down to personal preference as there is no defined criteria
Ask a 1000 people and the answer will spread across multiple players
Seriously though. Who gives a fig what Carragher thinks?We all know he is incapable of any form of objectivity.