Delighted for Palace.
But that decision is absolutely shocking.
But that decision is absolutely shocking.
Bunkermagnet
Journeyman Pro
The saved pen was never a pen, the City player was going down before the keeper touched him.
However, its no good City complaining they lost by 1 goal, they should have scored themsleves then they wouldnt have.
Arthur Wedge
Well-known member
Arthur Wedge
Well-known member
“Proper Football”
Skytot
Well-known member
Keeper shouldn’t be on the pitch .
Skytot
Well-known member
It changed the game . You would be speaking about it as much as me if it was against Liverpool in a cup final . It was the worst VAR decision I’ve seen !
You are aware we have all said it was a poor decision
Bunkermagnet
Journeyman Pro
City have had plenty of luck with their players not getting punished.
City got everything they deserved today.
Perhaps their fans should looking at why Haarland didn't have the guts to take the pen (they shouldnt have got)
Arthur Wedge
Well-known member
People are speaking about , and people have said it was a poor decision
And the list of decisions that have been poor is very long
It was no worse than the
Blatent Handball from Rodri against Everton
The Studs in the chest from Doku
Of the disallowed Diaz goal against Spurs
Last edited:
Bunkermagnet
Journeyman Pro
No chance was it the worst, it's just happened to your team.
Skytot
Well-known member
Omg . Is that what you’ve got
Skytot
Well-known member
Sorry, don’t understand
4LEX
Well-known member
That was a really interesting issue. I know his record is poor but if you can't back yourself to score from 12 yards with a free shot what are you doing on the pitch? He was terrible today, obviously miles off the pace fitness wise.
Skytot
Well-known member
My original point after coming in from the match and looking on this thread , was I expect more discussion about a scandalous decision where a keeper should have been sent off . Yes it was mentioned but was it discussed no .
Pin-seeker
Well-known member
Palace should have been down to 10 men 100%.
But City had over 100 mins & didn’t score a goal.
As for Pep and Henderson at the end.
Does anyone know what was said?
But City had over 100 mins & didn’t score a goal.
As for Pep and Henderson at the end.
Does anyone know what was said?
Skytot
Well-known member
He missed his last one , and missed I think a couple previously . Mamoosh wanted it and Haaland can’t really have any argument s
Arthur Wedge
Well-known member
I guess as it helped Palace win the first major trophy in their history most aren’t too bothered about it
Pin-seeker
Well-known member
Swango1980
Well-known member
Biased? I've said it was a red card, and that clearly changed the course of the game. What else would you like me to do? Phone the FA and instruct them to give the cup to City?
I have no love for City, so of course I'm delighted the red card wasn't given, as I said. Just like a City or Liverpool fan would not be crying if Man Utd were the victims of a bad decision, especially against the underdog.
But, ultimately City lost a game of 11 v 11, despite getting a dodgy penalty and awarded 10 mins of injury time. If you needed the opposition keeper to be sent off early in the first half to win the trophy, that is what you really need to feel sad about. Not good enough today.
Swango1980
Well-known member
It was mentioned 11 times before your initial comment. There was really no discussion to be had, because everyone agreed it was the wrong decision.
Had one person thought it was correct, then that would have generated about 4 pages of debate.
Skytot
Well-known member
Of course I 100% get that . The most successful English club in the last 10 years against a team that’s not won a major trophy ( might be wrong) , no one wanted city to win today . But thought a major decision like that deserved a bit of a discussion
