GreiginFife
Money List Winner
Leeds and Burnley back in the big time.
Leeds and Burnley back in the big time.
Well, someone needs to keep West Ham company in the drop zone…There's 2 of the bottom 3 for next season
Indeed but I am not sure if they are strong enough to stay there. This year has shown there seems to be a growing gap between the top of the championship and what is needed to stay in the PLLeeds and Burnley back in the big time.
Well, someone needs to keep West Ham company in the drop zone…
Well, someone needs to keep West Ham company in the drop zone…
A tad harsh.Well, someone needs to keep West Ham company in the drop zone…
Strong league, weak league, medium league...who cares. Just enjoy winning it without an asterix by your name![]()
Strong league, weak league, medium league...who cares. Just enjoy winning it without an asterix by your name![]()
If the strength of the league was defined by how high a points total the winners got (relative to points available), then the Scottish league would probably have been the strongest league in the world for numerous seasons.Been a lot of talk that it’s the weakest league in history etc etc etc
Here is a graphic on how many points the winners have got each season
View attachment 57774
We could potentially finish with 94 points
Is it really a weak league or potentially just a strong as all the other years
If the strength of the league was defined by how high a points total the winners got (relative to points available), then the Scottish league would probably have been the strongest league in the world for numerous seasons.
The league has been incredibly weak. Pretty much all of the most wealthy sides have been very poor, even awful. Arsenal haven't even been that great. I don't think Liverpool have even been that impressive, but fair play to them managed to scrape a lot of wins that could have been dropped points.
Some sides have done very well, relative to what you'd have expected. Like Forest. And the 3 bottom sides have been horrific.
For me, the most boring league ever. In fairness, possibly because my side have been so bad. But, there hasn't really been a battle at the top, or the bottom. Only battle is European spots, which might be exciting for sides involved, less so to the neutral. Though maybe it points to it being a good idea having 5 or 6 teams going into Europe, because at least it gives some excitement to domestic leagues when there is no title challenge to enjoy
I'm not sure VAR is better in Europe at all, I just think we watch about 10 times more domestic games than European, so we don't miss any of the blunders domestically.A lot of the times the issue isn’t with the refs - they have a single instant look and unless they have a clear sight of the incident and it’s clear as day then it’s not always easy for the on field ref
But VAR sees thw incident clear as day and can see it multiple times for various angles
When the tackle yesterday happened it looked a lazy trip and was surprised when he gave a red
When it was shown on VAR you can see why he gave it - it was late , cynical and dangerous , I would hope that if the ref gave a yellow that VAR would have sent the ref to the screen to look again
But it’s the VAR ref that’s been the issue this season - countless times they have seen bad tackles and just gone with the ref
The VAR ref in the Prem is either scared to overturn their mate in the middle or they are completely incompetent and not fit for the job - for some it’s definitely the second one
Look at how it appears to be better in Europe
Spurs game against Frankfurt - ref missed a penalty , VAR got him to check it and he gave it , then he gave a penalty that shouldn’t have been so again VAR got involved and he changed his mind
VAR in the Prem is imo a complete mess and has made the games worse - either sort it out and they actually get involved at the right times ( and not just offsides ) or bin it off
A very balanced reply. I don't think any side has been exceptional and Liverpool have managed to avoid silly draws and defeats which has plagued the sides below them too often hence the gap. I am not convinced they are head and shoulders above the others. Is that a sign of the PL being more competitive where anyone can now get points against anyone or is there perhaps a weakness where FFP has had an impact on buying the very best players that have been the defining piece of the jigsawIf the strength of the league was defined by how high a points total the winners got (relative to points available), then the Scottish league would probably have been the strongest league in the world for numerous seasons.
The league has been incredibly weak. Pretty much all of the most wealthy sides have been very poor, even awful. Arsenal haven't even been that great. I don't think Liverpool have even been that impressive, but fair play to them managed to scrape a lot of wins that could have been dropped points.
Some sides have done very well, relative to what you'd have expected. Like Forest. And the 3 bottom sides have been horrific.
For me, the most boring league ever. In fairness, possibly because my side have been so bad. But, there hasn't really been a battle at the top, or the bottom. Only battle is European spots, which might be exciting for sides involved, less so to the neutral. Though maybe it points to it being a good idea having 5 or 6 teams going into Europe, because at least it gives some excitement to domestic leagues when there is no title challenge to enjoy
I wonder if the bottom sides, lately, have been hampered because the managers feel like they need to play like prime Barcelona from a decade or so ago. Basically copy Pep. Hipster football.Yes gone are the days of a tight relegation battle where the bottom sides could cost the title winners serious points.. the league has been very poor this season.
I'm sure city will return next season, united will shoot up with a decent window and if spurs sack the moron so will they.. then suddenly the league will get more competitive again and the race will be tighter
Never did Wimbledon any harm. I think you are right and football in the PL has become formulaic and everyone plays a similar style. Even the more direct championship sides that have got promoted seem to ditch what got them there to play a "safer" possession styleI wonder if the bottom sides, lately, have been hampered because the managers feel like they need to play like prime Barcelona from a decade or so ago. Basically copy Pep. Hipster football.
If they keep getting battered, I reckon one side will come up, play long ball, 2 big strikers up front. And suddenly do some damage because no other side, even the top ones, are used to having to deal with it.
Then there might be a shift to that style of football
The number of wins from losing positions suggests to me that they aren’t as dominant as City have been in recent times, or Man Utd, Arsenal and Chelsea further back.A very balanced reply. I don't think any side has been exceptional and Liverpool have managed to avoid silly draws and defeats which has plagued the sides below them too often hence the gap. I am not convinced they are head and shoulders above the others. Is that a sign of the PL being more competitive where anyone can now get points against anyone or is there perhaps a weakness where FFP has had an impact on buying the very best players that have been the defining piece of the jigsaw
You would have been better seeing if Harry was available before Graeme.Now now Greigtop 10 next season once potter has a full summer!!
You speak like I don’t know or understand football…The gap between those coming up and the Prem has increased due to those teams who have battled for relegation in the past have massively improved
Suspect West Ham will be around it but Everton with Moyes will be a lot better , Wolves depending on who they keep