Beezerk
Money List Winner
Can we talk about Man Utd again please 
Personally I like the way someone is bigging up there club and being torn to shreds with facts and figures.Can we talk about Man Utd again please![]()
Who?You said he tended to buy ready made players
And his record of bringing youth players though was poor ?
So are those players not youth players brought into the first team
They aren’t ready made
Could add
McConnell
Danns
Koumas
Morton
Three more that have come through
Not according to the web - but then we know you pick and choose your sources to match your views![]()
Who?
If there’s so many academy players were are they?
He actually made quite a bit money by selling those not good enough! Solanke, Brewster, Williams…
Apart from 1 or 2 players staying and becoming established he bought established players to strengthen your squad.
If it wasn't for Amad, then I can guarantee there would be at least one person in here that would have been eager to discuss Man Utd for the next couple of days.Can we talk about Man Utd again please![]()
So the only way you could compete with City was to buy and, as I said FSG didn’t give Klopp enough support at times.Isn’t that how must clubs work
They buy players , sell players
Some youth comes through , some are good enough , some aren’t and are sold on
Is there any club that’s different
FSG announces strategic minority investment in LFC from Dynasty Equity - Liverpool FC
Fenway Sports Group has announced that global sports investment firm Dynasty Equity has completed a strategic common equity minority investment in Liverpool FC.www.liverpoolfc.com
“The minority investment will primarily be used to pay down bank debt incurred during the COVID-19 pandemic and capital expenses made to enhance Anfield, build the AXA Training Centre, repurchase Melwood training ground and, most recently, acquisitions during the summer transfer window.”
So the only way you could compete with City was to buy and, as I said FSG didn’t give Klopp enough support at times.
Now gone full circle, thanks for proving my point, took a while, but we got there in the end.![]()
I was very chuffed with their result - I put Amad Diallo into my Fantasy team this week! It's about time I got something right this season.Can we talk about Man Utd again please![]()
To be honest, that doesn’t make the best read. Acquiring investment to pay for players means dividends will be paid out for a lot longer than if it had been done by selling and buying players. The pretty picture you painted around Liverpool’s transfers isn’t quite so pretty. The share prices will rise meaning that whoever bought the shares via investment gets paid twice. Once via the value of the shares, and then topped up with dividends.
The balance sheet will look better but a bit like PFI financing hospitals, it’ll cost more in the long run. It’s all legal and above board but it’s not pretty.
Just heard on the radio that Haaland has signed a 9 and a half year contract at City, keeping him there until 2034. That is a big commitment, although wonder how many clauses he has in that contract
See my initial reply to Don were I said some supporters had wished FSG had spent more on players. Even said FSG could be admired on how they run the Club.
Im struggling to see where your point has been proven
FSG employ people to deal with the football matters
The money for players comes from the revenue the club makes which includes selling players - Klopp worked under the budget the club was able to set.
As stated right at the start - they don’t buy players with their own money , it’s all self sustaining
We missed out on two titles battling with City by a single point.
Every club buys players , some more than others , some spend more than others and as we have seen just by spending more doesnt guarantee success
See my initial reply to Don were I said some supporters had wished FSG had spent more on players. Even said FSG could be admired on how they run the Club.
All you have done is reinforce the financial position, we know all about the financial side, the point remains that some Lpool supporters believe all this spending in other areas should of been spent on players.
Sorry what dividends ? The club don’t pay out dividends.
The club isn’t a public company where shares can be bought and dividends paid out to share holders
The investment helped pay off a credit loan that was taken out to help pay a release clause
Most transfers are in installments - we had to pay one in a lump sum and most clubs take out a credit loan to pay that and then pay it pace in instalments to amortise the fee
The investment was made by someone/group who will require a return. That return might be scheduled as part payment each year + interest. If £80m was invested, the scheduled return will be way more than £80m, just like a bank loan.
You’ve been painting a picture of a balanced budget made with transfer buys covered by sales and commercial activities when in reality, for all your spin, Liverpool FC operate no differently than any other club. They might be more risk averse, or maybe their successes help with the budget, but they’re just a.n.other club.
The return is they own a percentage of the club which will be worth more when the club is sold - it’s something that’s now in their portfolio to own a small % of the club
The club don’t pay out dividends- it’s there in the accounts
It’s the same with the investment into FSG by Redbird
The accounts are public - purchases are made via revenue from player sales , commercial activities , telly money etc
They aren’t loaning the club money to go and buy players etc it’s all from income generated by the club itself