The Footie Thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 15344
  • Start date Start date
You said he tended to buy ready made players

And his record of bringing youth players though was poor ?

So are those players not youth players brought into the first team

They aren’t ready made

Could add

McConnell
Danns
Koumas
Morton



Three more that have come through
Who?
If there’s so many academy players were are they?
He actually made quite a bit money by selling those not good enough! Solanke, Brewster, Williams…

Apart from 1 or 2 players staying and becoming established he bought established players to strengthen your squad.
 
Not according to the web - but then we know you pick and choose your sources to match your views ;)

“The minority investment will primarily be used to pay down bank debt incurred during the COVID-19 pandemic and capital expenses made to enhance Anfield, build the AXA Training Centre, repurchase Melwood training ground and, most recently, acquisitions during the summer transfer window.”
 
Who?
If there’s so many academy players were are they?
He actually made quite a bit money by selling those not good enough! Solanke, Brewster, Williams…

Apart from 1 or 2 players staying and becoming established he bought established players to strengthen your squad.

Isn’t that how must clubs work 🤷‍♂️

They buy players , sell players

Some youth comes through , some are good enough , some aren’t and are sold on

Is there any club that’s different
 
Isn’t that how must clubs work 🤷‍♂️

They buy players , sell players

Some youth comes through , some are good enough , some aren’t and are sold on

Is there any club that’s different
So the only way you could compete with City was to buy and, as I said FSG didn’t give Klopp enough support at times.

Now gone full circle, thanks for proving my point, took a while, but we got there in the end.👍🏻
 

“The minority investment will primarily be used to pay down bank debt incurred during the COVID-19 pandemic and capital expenses made to enhance Anfield, build the AXA Training Centre, repurchase Melwood training ground and, most recently, acquisitions during the summer transfer window.”

To be honest, that doesn’t make the best read. Acquiring investment to pay for players means dividends will be paid out for a lot longer than if it had been done by selling and buying players. The pretty picture you painted around Liverpool’s transfers isn’t quite so pretty. The share prices will rise meaning that whoever bought the shares via investment gets paid twice. Once via the value of the shares, and then topped up with dividends.

The balance sheet will look better but a bit like PFI financing hospitals, it’ll cost more in the long run. It’s all legal and above board but it’s not pretty.
 
So the only way you could compete with City was to buy and, as I said FSG didn’t give Klopp enough support at times.

Now gone full circle, thanks for proving my point, took a while, but we got there in the end.👍🏻

🤷‍♂️

Im struggling to see where your point has been proven

FSG employ people to deal with the football matters

The money for players comes from the revenue the club makes which includes selling players - Klopp worked under the budget the club was able to set.

As stated right at the start - they don’t buy players with their own money , it’s all self sustaining

We missed out on two titles battling with City by a single point.

Every club buys players , some more than others , some spend more than others and as we have seen just by spending more doesnt guarantee success
 
To be honest, that doesn’t make the best read. Acquiring investment to pay for players means dividends will be paid out for a lot longer than if it had been done by selling and buying players. The pretty picture you painted around Liverpool’s transfers isn’t quite so pretty. The share prices will rise meaning that whoever bought the shares via investment gets paid twice. Once via the value of the shares, and then topped up with dividends.

The balance sheet will look better but a bit like PFI financing hospitals, it’ll cost more in the long run. It’s all legal and above board but it’s not pretty.

Sorry what dividends ? The club don’t pay out dividends.

The club isn’t a public company where shares can be bought and dividends paid out to share holders

The investment helped pay off a credit loan that was taken out to help pay a release clause

Most transfers are in installments - we had to pay one in a lump sum and most clubs take out a credit loan to pay that and then pay it pace in instalments to amortise the fee
 
🤷‍♂️

Im struggling to see where your point has been proven

FSG employ people to deal with the football matters

The money for players comes from the revenue the club makes which includes selling players - Klopp worked under the budget the club was able to set.

As stated right at the start - they don’t buy players with their own money , it’s all self sustaining

We missed out on two titles battling with City by a single point.

Every club buys players , some more than others , some spend more than others and as we have seen just by spending more doesnt guarantee success
See my initial reply to Don were I said some supporters had wished FSG had spent more on players. Even said FSG could be admired on how they run the Club.

All you have done is reinforce the financial position, we know all about the financial side, the point remains that some Lpool supporters believe all this spending in other areas should of been spent on players.
 


Some City get right and some they get wrong. But that’s promoting your academy. That’s giving kids a chance not necessarily at City, but somewhere.
 
See my initial reply to Don were I said some supporters had wished FSG had spent more on players. Even said FSG could be admired on how they run the Club.

All you have done is reinforce the financial position, we know all about the financial side, the point remains that some Lpool supporters believe all this spending in other areas should of been spent on players.

Spending in what other areas ?

If by that you mean stadium improvements - that all there for the long term and something that should have been done in the 90’s and very much needed

It’s why your own club has built a new one
 
Last edited:
Sorry what dividends ? The club don’t pay out dividends.

The club isn’t a public company where shares can be bought and dividends paid out to share holders

The investment helped pay off a credit loan that was taken out to help pay a release clause

Most transfers are in installments - we had to pay one in a lump sum and most clubs take out a credit loan to pay that and then pay it pace in instalments to amortise the fee

The investment was made by someone/group who will require a return. That return might be scheduled as part payment each year + interest. If £80m was invested, the scheduled return will be way more than £80m, just like a bank loan.

You’ve been painting a picture of a balanced budget made with transfer buys covered by sales and commercial activities when in reality, for all your spin, Liverpool FC operate no differently than any other club. They might be more risk averse, or maybe their successes help with the budget, but they’re just a.n.other club.
 
The investment was made by someone/group who will require a return. That return might be scheduled as part payment each year + interest. If £80m was invested, the scheduled return will be way more than £80m, just like a bank loan.

You’ve been painting a picture of a balanced budget made with transfer buys covered by sales and commercial activities when in reality, for all your spin, Liverpool FC operate no differently than any other club. They might be more risk averse, or maybe their successes help with the budget, but they’re just a.n.other club.

The return is they own a percentage of the club which will be worth more when the club is sold - it’s something that’s now in their portfolio to own a small % of the club

The club don’t pay out dividends- it’s there in the accounts

It’s the same with the investment into FSG by Redbird

The accounts are public - purchases are made via revenue from player sales , commercial activities , telly money etc

They aren’t loaning the club money to go and buy players etc it’s all from income generated by the club itself

 
The return is they own a percentage of the club which will be worth more when the club is sold - it’s something that’s now in their portfolio to own a small % of the club

The club don’t pay out dividends- it’s there in the accounts

It’s the same with the investment into FSG by Redbird

The accounts are public - purchases are made via revenue from player sales , commercial activities , telly money etc

They aren’t loaning the club money to go and buy players etc it’s all from income generated by the club itself


Read your post, 73364, specifically the bit in quotation marks that says some of the money was used in the summer transfer window.
 
Top