D
Deleted member 1740
Guest
Let it go. Suck it up. Refs make mistakes, they're only human. Respect the refs decision etc etc.And just to clarify, outside the topic above, Grealish was clearly onside. Just watched it again.
Let it go. Suck it up. Refs make mistakes, they're only human. Respect the refs decision etc etc.And just to clarify, outside the topic above, Grealish was clearly onside. Just watched it again.
That's that theory gone thenAnd just to clarify, outside the topic above, Grealish was clearly onside. Just watched it again.
Ahh, OK. There is no rule for this situation, so officials can just make it up as they please.I never ever claimed there was a rule.
Think pep has come out and said he blew for the foul but play continued so he blew againThat's that theory gone then. Presumably the refs association or PL will confirm at some point what happened then.
Are you for real?Ahh, OK. There is no rule for this situation, so officials can just make it up as they please.
I guess watching hundreds of games has given you this fantastic knowledge of the rules![]()
This situation has never happened. If a goal is scored and overruled for offside by VAR, then the game is restarted with a freekick for offside for the opposing side (Spurs in this case). It never goes back for a freekick where the advantage was played from for attcking side (City in this case)Easy
Turns out he was offside, you give the free kick as it turns out there was no advantage. Exactly as he would have done had he been miles offside and flag went up.
It was an absolute shocker from the ref, there’s no getting away from that.
I've already explained why you haven't seem this, it would be hugely rare.Are you for real?
You've claimed, and i quote exact word for word below
This situation has never happened. If a goal is scored and overruled for offside by VAR, then the game is restarted with a freekick for offside for the opposing side (Spurs in this case). It never goes back for a freekick where the advantage was played from for attcking side (City in this case)
Trouble is though as Neville said, City got one v Utd earlier in the season and it was soft. Never a penalty. Every week we end up talking about the rules, VAR and officials. Like F1 I am seriously losing interest.Massive moment in the game wrongly called by the official
Surprised he didn't give that soft pen at the end to make up for his mistake
Sounds like a convenient excuse. His body language clearly looked like he was consciously signalling to play advantage. It definitely wasn't a hand gesture that was saying "blooming hell, I tried blowing my whistle but it made no sound, wait wait wait, let me try again"Think pep has come out and said he blew for the foul but play continued so he blew again
Either way his half hearted hand gestures weren't up to standard.. looked like play on
I don't think any of our refs are fit for purpose ATM but problem is the level below are they going to be just as bad?
Sounds like a convenient excuse. His body language clearly looked like he was consciously signalling to play advantage. It definitely wasn't a hand gesture that was saying "blooming hell, I tried blowing my whistle but it made no sound, wait wait wait, let me try again"![]()
This would make the most sense to me. I've only seen the incident in a clip on Twitter but it appears that the ref points with one arm/hand which is normally the signal for a free kick. For an advantage they signal with both arms/hands.Think pep has come out and said he blew for the foul but play continued so he blew again
Either way his half hearted hand gestures weren't up to standard.. looked like play on
I don't think any of our refs are fit for purpose ATM but problem is the level below are they going to be just as bad?

This would make the most sense to me. I've only seen the incident in a clip on Twitter but it appears that the ref points with one arm/hand which is normally the signal for a free kick. For an advantage they signal with both arms/hands.
View attachment 50792 View attachment 50791
The signal certainly looked more like the former than the latter. Although I have just looked at the rules and it says advantage can be signalled with "one or both arms at shoulder height" so it comes down to where his arm was.
the next trophy in the cabinet will be the most FFP breaches trophyUnless you win trophies![]()
Another open top bus tourthe next trophy in the cabinet will be the most FFP breaches trophy
The over reaction is nothing to do with whether Grealish would have scored or not, it was to do with a referees decision. In the situation of Grealish being clear through. There was only Two options.Slight overreaction from City I think. Who's to say Grealish would have scored? His finishing isn't the most consistent. Royal probably outpaces him and then fouls him on the edge of the box if anything. If it was Haaland through on goal then different story. They were just angry that they always struggle to beat us for some reason.
It's just a split-second judgement call whether to play the advantage or not. It's not even a decision issue, because there was a foul, so the decision he got correct. He possibly should have played advantage but he chose not to. Oh well. Plenty of worse calls have happened this season, that's not even in the top ten.The over reaction is nothing to do with whether Grealish would have scored or not, it was to do with a referees decision. In the situation of Grealish being clear through. There was only Two options.
Grealish scored.
Grealish didn’t score.
The referee came up with a third option.
I thought the game was a scruffy affair. Probably exciting for the neutral. But that incident with the ref if it had been allowed to continue with Grealish being through would have been a pivotal moment for the game and possibly the title race. For both clubs. Just to pick up on your second point. Haaland had one of those days yesterday where he couldn’t hit a barn door. Grealish had one chance and scored.
He should not be reffing if he can’t see a striker in a strikers role.Has anyone got any other angles on it? I've seen a clip from side on only. Is it possible that the ref didn't/couldn't see Grealish and only saw three Spurs defenders running back and thought there was no advantage?