• We'd like to take this opportunity to wish you a Happy Holidays and a very Merry Christmas from all at Golf Monthly. Thank you for sharing your 2025 with us!

The Footie Thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 15344
  • Start date Start date
Before you moan about a decision at least get the culprit correct.

Video evidence and you think it'vs a red card??? I'll file your opinions on football under Tierney's as theyre a match made in heaven.
I’ve accepted I was wrong about the player. Are you going to admit you’re wrong about intent being the determinant of a red card?

And yea, for the second time in a week Endo should’ve been sent off. And he wasn’t. Why not just admit it and accept your luck? It won’t change the outcome and you’d seen less biased.
 
I’ve accepted I was wrong about the player. Are you going to admit you’re wrong about intent being the determinant of a red card?

And yea, for the second time in a week Endo should’ve been sent off. And he wasn’t. Why not just admit it and accept your luck? It won’t change the outcome and you’d seen less biased.
Why would i admit he shouldve been sent off today when i dont believe he should've? It wasnt a even a yellow never mind a red.

It was a 50/50 tackle both players looked to have went in with the same amount of force and Norgaard (i think it was) didnt win the ball. Legs clashed and that was it.

There's the tackle. You still think it was a red?
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20231112_211253_X.jpg
    Screenshot_20231112_211253_X.jpg
    280.9 KB · Views: 14
Some game that, Chelsea should start climbing the table if they perform like that, what a tackle from Kovacic on Sterling right at the end there as well.
They certainly raise their game against the top sides, as if to prove their still relevant, but will drop points against a variety of weaker teams. A bit like LFC in the 90's.
 
Why would i admit he shouldve been sent off today when i dont believe he should've? It wasnt a even a yellow never mind a red.

It was a 50/50 tackle both players looked to have went in with the same amount of force and Norgaard (i think it was) didnt win the ball. Legs clashed and that was it.

There's the tackle. You still think it was a red?
Yes. I’ve seen the video multiple times. It’s cute that you think a still that shows Endo planting his studs on someone’s ankle as proof he shouldn’t have been sent off.
 
Yes. I’ve seen the video multiple times. It’s cute that you think a still that shows Endo planting his studs on someone’s ankle as proof he shouldn’t have been sent off.
Listening to the radio commentary, the feeling was as his foot was mainly pointing down, it was a 50/50 tackle without any nasty intent
 
Yes. I’ve seen the video multiple times. It’s cute that you think a still that shows Endo planting his studs on someone’s ankle as proof he shouldn’t have been sent off.
How can he plant his studs on Norgaards ankle when the ball is in between Endo's and Norgaards feet??

I seen it once in real time and knew it was nothing more than a coming together. The referee was in the perfect position to give a foul/card and waved play on. The incident was looked at for well over 30seconds by VAR which concluded no red card. If you know better i suggest you take up refereeing.
 
Listening to the radio commentary, the feeling was as his foot was mainly pointing down, it was a 50/50 tackle without any nasty intent
Shady knows better. Intent doesnt matter according to him although there's evidence PL referees have given penalties for "intent".
 
Why would i admit he shouldve been sent off today when i dont believe he should've? It wasnt a even a yellow never mind a red.

It was a 50/50 tackle both players looked to have went in with the same amount of force and Norgaard (i think it was) didnt win the ball. Legs clashed and that was it.

There's the tackle. You still think it was a red?
Show the still where the Liverpool player had both feet off the ground with studs showing.

He’s in a completely different body position to the other player who was under control.
 
Show the still where the Liverpool player had both feet off the ground with studs showing.

He’s in a completely different body position to the other player who was under control.
Sorry i dont have it.

According to 2 professional arbiters of the game, it wasnt a dangerous tackle and therefore VAR couldnt overrule the onfield refs decsion.

I dont know why people cant just accept the refs decision and get on with it or suck it up.
 
Sorry i dont have it.

According to 2 professional arbiters of the game, it wasnt a dangerous tackle and therefore VAR couldnt overrule the onfield refs decsion.

I dont know why people cant just accept the refs decision and get on with it or suck it up.
I accepted the referees decision when Pickford ended Vin Dijks season, when he didn't get penalised.

You're correct, they always make the correct call, never seen an incident that had since been confirmed as incorrect.
 
Also. Can
Sorry i dont have it.

According to 2 professional arbiters of the game, it wasnt a dangerous tackle and therefore VAR couldnt overrule the onfield refs decsion.

I dont know why people cant just accept the refs decision and get on with it or suck it up.
Indeed.
 
I accepted the referees decision when Pickford ended Vin Dijks season, when he didn't get penalised.

You're correct, they always make the correct call, never seen an incident that had since been confirmed as incorrect.
If only the millions of other football fans were all like you eh Swango (y)

Thank you, i knew eventually you'd see sense;)

You need to pay closer attention to games old boy.
 
England call up Ezri Konsa after the injury withdrawals.

So well deserved, a really great defender with a lot of ability and in fantastic form.
 
Top