Not gonna lie, it was a squeaky bum moment thinking Silva and a Walker was following them along with Mahrez and not so much Cancelo. Chuffed to bits with the signings. Don’t think CIty have finished yet though.
This, combined with Hendo and Fabinho, in stark contrast with City owners (as Tash mentions re: Walker & Silva), will truly define where our owners put greater value - cash or winning things.
As a fan if you kinda get the jest of where the club is going re the transfer market, alls well. When City won the treble it felt the transfer window was going to be brutal. Little did we know what was happening. At the moment City from what has come in and gone out. City have paid out £30 million for the three players signed. That’s fantastic business for City.
A club like Liverpool can afford to do that because there are plenty of players in teh world that want to play for them, even really good ones.
Well that’s no suprize to me.
He isn't doing VAR anymore. He is on Soccer Saturday at Sky now.
That's excluding so many of your past generations. A top Liverpool list without Roger Hunt
.Referees remain silent and don't explain their decisions, they get slated for not standing up to scrutiny. Referees explain why they make a decision, and acknowledge it was a "really bad call", and they are called stupid.
I wouldn't say Salah's stats say he is a better player than Gerrard. They are in totally different positions, and had different responsibilities within the team. Salah will have certain attributes as a player better than Gerrard that mean he is played as an attacking player and responsible for scoring. Gerrard will have certain attributes better than Salah that allowed him to be a huge player in the middle of the park, and a huge influence on the team. A player who could be the engine of the team. The question is, as an all round footballer, which player's combined attributes would you value more? Personally, I'd say Gerrard was a better player than Salah for Liverpool. And, if Gerrard played in this Liverpool team at his prime, for the last 6-7 years, we'd probably all be saying Gerrard is the best player in the side. Their De Bruyne type figure, even if other players might be scoring more goals.
That's excluding so many of your past generations. A top Liverpool list without Roger Hunt
To leave out your 60's, 70's and most of the 80's era, wow.
As to the point, Salah has to be up there. His goal scoring consistency is phenomenal.
Thompson, Liddle, Kennedy, Lawrenson, Molby, Whelan, Clemence, Grobbelar (why do keepers never make these lists?), Hughes, Neal, Nicol, Heighway.Well I can’t really judge players that I didn’t see play hence why no 60’s or 70’s
But not sure who is missing from that top ten beyond Hunt , Cally and Keegan
And 6 of the top ten are from the 80’s
The ironic thing is that when people said VAR is rammel, they have been proven right. VAR in its current format is not fit for purpose. We have always said that VAR is down to one persons opinion. But when “ looking after a mate” takes priority over making the right decision. How’s that right. We now have laws to “ protect” refs which results in a yellow. This is to help respect referees decisions. Seriously? How can you respect that? How can you respect anything this tit says again.
They are all great players but not when talking about top ten players
