• We'd like to take this opportunity to wish you a Happy Holidays and a very Merry Christmas from all at Golf Monthly. Thank you for sharing your 2025 with us!

The Footie Thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 15344
  • Start date Start date
nothing to do with VAR the booking, VAR doesnt have the remit to overturn the booking unless it gives a penalty (which arguably it could have done)

We’ve seen all season pens given for less, now the “clear and obvious bar“ doesn’t exist surely it’s a pen?
 
i think its a pen yes, thats not universal though, only have to go back a page on this thread

not sure any of us know what is and what isnt anymore, where is the line?

Please don’t mention lines???

Its obvious the refs don’t know what is an isnt.
 
I assume Luiz didn't have to leave the pitch because the game wasn't actually continuing. They would have done the assessment while Jimenez was being treated, while the game was paused.

There was no suggestion that he later went off for concussion or that the doctor got it wrong. Arteta said he was just uncomfortable wearing the tight bandage, and it kept bleeding more every time he headed it so there was no point in him playing.
He cracked his head, it kept bleeding. Why would keeping heading the ball in those circumstances be a good idea? Off the pitch, get an x-ray, reduce the potential of swelling in the brain. I find it scary that football is still working this way.
 
He cracked his head, it kept bleeding. Why would keeping heading the ball in those circumstances be a good idea? Off the pitch, get an x-ray, reduce the potential of swelling in the brain. I find it scary that football is still working this way.
It's still just a cut on the head though, it doesn't necessarily mean he had any concussion at all. We're talking about concussion protocol here.
 
In view of the recent evidence linking heading the ball and head injuries to the possibility of increasing the risk of developing dementia i find it incredible that Luiz was allowed to play on.

At the very least he should have been temporarily replaced and a thorough check undertaken in the medical room.

Not the frankly inadequate on field test as detailed by Troy Deeney on the radio this morning.

In this respect football is way behind some other sports and there's absolutely no excuse.
 
I would like to see even stricter rules being brought in where the decision is made by an independent doctor rather than the club doctor. I know that the doctor's responsibility is to the welfare of their patient but in a 50/50 situation with a player like Salah/Aguero/Fernandes/Kane the doctor must feel the pressure to allow them to play on, knowing how important tehy are to their team.
Didn’t Jose doctor at Chelsea resign over this issue.
 
He stands on his toe
Might only be a bit but he did stand on his toe.
That’s enough now apparently.
I think the ref got it wrong.
Why did you say it like that? Surely that's always been a foul? You stand on someone's foot and trip them up in the box that's a penalty 100 times out of 100 isn't it? :LOL:
 
In view of the recent evidence linking heading the ball and head injuries to the possibility of increasing the risk of developing dementia i find it incredible that Luiz was allowed to play on.

At the very least he should have been temporarily replaced and a thorough check undertaken in the medical room.

Not the frankly inadequate on field test as detailed by Troy Deeney on the radio this morning.

In this respect football is way behind some other sports and there's absolutely no excuse.
I don't disagree, but obviously the part in bold couldn't have happened yesterday as it would require a change of rules.
 
Top