D
Deleted member 1740
Guest
yep they all played when Villa got 7maybe youll be better without them
![]()
You're worse than my tart.......
??
yep they all played when Villa got 7maybe youll be better without them
![]()
Pep's done well at City but has a blindspot and can't see past it. To me he looks burnt out and passionless, I can't believe he's signed a new two year deal. City are no better than last season, they're losing games in exactly the same manner. Dominating, wasteful and getting done on the counter. They're boring to watch and the oppsition have them figured out. The key issue is they've got no 30 goal striker now Aguero is past it and injury prone. They won't win the title.
Yeah, I certainly don't think Jesus is good enough. He's a reasonable back-up, but nowhere near Aguero's quality. That does make a big difference. Don't get me wrong, he scores a few goals, but is he consistent enough against the bigger sides? Good enough for a title-winning team? I don't think so. They look a totally different proposition with Aguero in there.It doesn't take Jose to work out how to beat City at the moment. City are poor where it counts, in either box. Too slow going forward and left exposed in numbers when they are countered. City could struggle to make top four at this rate ?
You're worse than my tart.......
??
Surely true if you take anyone's best two players?If City had a half decent striker on the pitch they'd have scored 3 or 4. Spurs defensively aren't great at all, but Jose had them better organised than Pep did today.
When your best player - a striker - is making crucial blocks and tackles back in defence then you're actually in a bit of trouble; Kane has done that on a number of occasions this season.
Badically take Kane and Son out of that Spurs team and there's not too much there to worry anyone.
OK cant believe im going to argue for Spurs and/or Mourinho, let alone both but here goes
Spurs are playing some great football, scoring goals for fun, and have a genuine chance to win the league
Youre going to have to look for a very very long time to find a disappointed Spurs fan currently!
Oh oh,Not to disappoint ?
I’ve been brought up to a certain style of football, so I’m having difficulty buying into this.
Another adjective is “ Leopard and spots......
Oh oh,
Someones played the West Ham card ??
Thankfully we’ve not had Allardyce, but you get my drift ?
You'd rather we go all guns blazing up against City and get beat 4-1 like we have done quite a few times over the years? Not for me. It's not like we're scoring rubbish goals or just set pieces either, our attacking play is still great at times, we've just coupled it with some defensive resilience at long last. What's wrong with that?Not to disappoint ?
I’ve been brought up to a certain style of football, so I’m having difficulty buying into this.
Another adjective is “ Leopard and spots......
Genuine question .What an absolute Mourinho performance. Dier was outstanding at the back, best game I've ever seen from him. I do think Ederson is very overrated by a lot of people. I don't think he needs to run off his line like a lunatic on either goal, and he got nutmegged both times. But we're finally starting to see a more resilient defence which is what Jose is meant to bring you, took him a while though. Top of the league and we know Liverpool or Leicester will drop points.
We beat City 2-0. Take that all day long. Personally I think fans who expect the team to try and play beautiful football and not get done over by a superior team are stupid. It's naive.Genuine question .
Would the fans be happy to watch you defend like that at home if they were there.?
Or would they just be happy with the win?
I wouldn’t say City are superior atm .We beat City 2-0. Take that all day long. Personally I think fans who expect the team to try and play beautiful football and not get done over by a superior team are stupid. It's naive.
You'd rather we go all guns blazing up against City and get beat 4-1 like we have done quite a few times over the years? Not for me. It's not like we're scoring rubbish goals or just set pieces either, our attacking play is still great at times, we've just coupled it with some defensive resilience at long last. What's wrong with that?
Surely true if you take anyone's best two players?
Don't get me wrong, I'm not really on board with talk tipping us for the league. Not many league winners will play another top team and be on the wrong end of that much possession for an entire half and have that many people behind the ball. It doesn't matter if you get the results. But next week at Chelsea, I don't think they'll be as kind if we give them 70% possession to be honest. They look a better side than City at the moment.
Not to disappoint ?
I’ve been brought up to a certain style of football, so I’m having difficulty buying into this.
Another adjective is “ Leopard and spots......
Have we written Burnley off yet...Can they still win the league?
We beat City 2-0. Take that all day long. Personally I think fans who expect the team to try and play beautiful football and not get done over by a superior team are stupid. It's naive.