Are we still talking about the tackle today by the Leeds player? He wasn't late, he won the ball and to me it looked like it was his follow through with his other leg that did the damage. I think it will get rescinded and that the ref only sent the player off because of the injury not because of the tackle. He was letting play go on until he saw Salah's reaction so obviously didn't think it was that bad.
Yeah. It was a bad tackle regardless. I'm all for good strong tackling but that isn't acceptable. From my team aswell.
It was that bad sky haven't shown it again.
PS. I only watched it on twitter?
Sky showed it again and stopped it before showing the ankle being dislocated - the player got the ball clean. From that replay it certainly didn’t look at red card tackle
It wasn't even a foul.Sky showed it again and stopped it before showing the ankle being dislocated - the player got the ball clean. From that replay it certainly didn’t look at red card tackle
I said Bielsa last week is nieve going all out attack every week without any defensive nouse.
Will score goals but will also get battered.
I said Bielsa last week is nieve going all out attack every week without any defensive nouse.
Will score goals but will also get battered.
Yes it is but it’s boring when you think you are right every time.Yes he did but it was dangerous and Wreckless.
I'm not saying he deliberately went to hurt Elliot, totally the opposite infact but when any player attempts tackle and is late like that its a red card.
I did until I realised you talk tripe.
Play the poster?? Isn't that the whole point of a forum to respond to posts?
Is that just a myth then.?It’s good news. A break is very rarely better than a dislocation.
Spot on but it was a foul.Are we still talking about the tackle today by the Leeds player? He wasn't late, he won the ball and to me it looked like it was his follow through with his other leg that did the damage. I think it will get rescinded and that the ref only sent the player off because of the injury not because of the tackle. He was letting play go on until he saw Salah's reaction so obviously didn't think it was that bad.
Yes it is but it’s boring when you think you are right every time.
And if it dosnt agree with you it’s tripe.
It’s opinion based .
And the tackle by Cantwell you mentioned the ball was nowhere near and he delibaretly played the man.( Jotta)
He was just lucky he didn’t hurt him.
That’s a red imo.
But you like that sort of thing I remember.!
Definitely a myth most of the time though it depends on the dislocation. A dislocation is often accompanied by smaller fractures called avulsion fractures where the ligaments or tendons are put under so much force they can pull chunks of bone off with them, and dislocations are a prime cause of these especially where you can see such a large dislocation is happened to Elliott - the way his foot was pointing the wrong direction is a bad sign. But on average I’d much rather have a relocatable dislocation than an actual break on a bone which is by and large less predictable.Is that just a myth then.?
Have heard it a lot.
It wasn't even a foul.
Aww come on, you wouldn’t have it any other way. ?Sky really are milking Ronaldo's return, it's so nauseating.
There's been no mention of poor goalkeeping for both his goals either.
Poor goalkeeping?Sky really are milking Ronaldo's return, it's so nauseating.
There's been no mention of poor goalkeeping for both his goals either.
Is it ok to have both feet off the ground going into a tackle now ?
TBF, I dont want to see sliding tackles banned from the game.
It was unfortunate incident and in no way would I blame the Leeds lad. Just one of them things, sadly.
Agreed, not a foul to me. Although given it is subjective by the ref, and they often like to award fouls as soon as there is any contact, then even if a foul was awarded probably not a yellow card foul. Certainly wouldn't have been had Elliot not unfortunately received his terrible injury. The ref didn't even award a foul, he was absolutely fine with the challenge, so he certainly was not going to award a red card for what he thought was a fair challenge. He only stopped play when the seriousness of the injury became apparent. If the red card was HIS decision, then he was only guessing on the recklessness of the challenge. If it was not his decision, then VAR had to be sure he made a serious error.I agree mate
It’s an unfortunate incident that Imo was a yellow card at most but it was a foul imo