The Footie Thread

[Billysboots]

All I know is it looks as though his Ma cuts his hair

With a broken bottle.

 

[PaulMdj]

Cole Palmer is hugely overrated isn’t he

TBH, I thought he was the only decent Chelsea player, sadly, for him, he’s on a different level.

Put him in Asenal’s midfield or along side Fernandes from Utd and he’d be outstanding.

 

[Slime]

Rosenior's contract is until 2032!
Does that mean that Chelsea will have a new manager by 9.00pm?

 

[Arthur Wedge]

Interesting challenge by Tarkowski

 

[Red devil]

TBH, I thought he was the only decent Chelsea player, sadly, for him, he’s on a different level.

Put him in Asenal’s midfield or along side Fernandes from Utd and he’d be outstanding.

Wouldn't get in Liverpool's midfield though

 

[clubchamp98]

Liverpool lost because they were rubbish

Havnt seen it yet playing golf.

Another bad display according to the lads in the clubhouse.

 

[Red devil]

Interesting challenge by Tarkowski

Very

 

[clubchamp98]

Wouldn't get in Liverpool's midfield though

Slot would have him at Right Back

 

[PaulMdj]

Interesting challenge by Tarkowski

Should of been a Red, wouldn’t be surprised if he’s retrospectively charged.

 

[Arthur Wedge]

Should of been a Red, wouldn’t be surprised if he’s retrospectively charged.

It doesn’t give people much confidence in VAR when everyone can see it but for some strange reason they say it’s nothing

Was a clear red and penalty

 

[PaulMdj]

It doesn’t give people much confidence in VAR when everyone can see it but for some strange reason they say it’s nothing

Was a clear red and penalty

Again though Phil, did VAR see it? Haven’t we heard in the past they don’t have the cameras that Sky does.

VAR will never get 100% correct.

 

[Arthur Wedge]

Again though Phil, did VAR see it? Haven’t we heard in the past they don’t have the cameras that Sky does.

VAR will never get 100% correct.

Yes VAR see it , they certainly have cameras to see into the box for a corner or set piece

If they can’t see that then it’s not fit for purpose

They even said it was checked and cleared as a “coming together”

 

[Pin-seeker]

Again though Phil, did VAR see it? Haven’t we heard in the past they don’t have the cameras that Sky does.

VAR will never get 100% correct.

Maybe the VAR team should download the Sky app.
Sky will be showing the incident multiple times whilst VAR are scratching their heads & ruining the game.

 

[PaulMdj]

Yes VAR see it , they certainly have cameras to see into the box for a corner or set piece

If they can’t see that then it’s not fit for purpose

They even said it was checked and cleared as a “coming together”

So you don’t know then!

They have some cameras in the box, and covering all areas of the pitch, but your answer doesn’t prove they have all the camera angles Sky have and from their angle it was a coming together.

 

[Swango1980]

Should of been a Red, wouldn’t be surprised if he’s retrospectively charged.

Pretty sure he can't be retrospectively charged when VAR is in operation. Not sure anyone else ever has, even if it is decided VAR missed a definite red card (also missed by onfield ref)?

 

[Arthur Wedge]

So you don’t know then!

They have some cameras in the box, and covering all areas of the pitch, but your answer doesn’t prove they have all the camera angles Sky have and from their angle it was a coming together.

“checked and cleared”

They saw the incident and cleared it