The Footie Thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 15344
  • Start date Start date
Start looking for replacements. His first X1 is very thin and with Europe they're playing loads

Palace just aren't a big club and have punched above their weight over the last few years off the back of some great signings. I remember going there 15 odd years ago and the ground was half empty. It's just a natural cycle. They won the FA Cup which is really special for them so they will always have that to look back on. Still think they have a decent chance of the Europa Conference League but Glasner needs to stop throwing his toys out of the pram.
 
Well, maybe after the Arsenal game at least, then we can see how Utd do against those types of teams.

Was shocked that City seemed to do very little to find Haaland. I knew you'd be weak at the back, but I was wondering if that was the most comfortable we've been in defence all season
I have had a bit of a rant on some City pages. Rico Lewis is a liability. He and Bernado were carried. How Cherki never got to start was beyond me. City played to many balls backwards and Utd spent most of the game facing City. Not enough balls played behind. City have a famous song, “ feed the goat and he will score”. I bet Haaland is starving tonight.
What shocks me re Utd is that is Utds best performance for an age, with the same players Amorim struggled with
 
He really isn’t,proper sleazy scumbag.

Of course he is. He might be an unpleasent person but he was and still is a great broadcaster. The stuff about Pep leaving, who knows.

Sky have the likes of Micah Richard's who filmed himself banging a bird in a toilet a few years back 😅 Numerous other dodgy stuff too and no one says anything about that. Carragher spat at a young girl while Neville is happy for some of his businesses to fail and the taxpaper pick up the cost. Nothing illegal but from someone who bangs on about morals it looks a little bit hypocritical.

The current Sky set up is shocking bar Keane and even his rants have become a bit tired.
 
Of course he is. He might be an unpleasent person but he was and still is a great broadcaster. The stuff about Pep leaving, who knows.

Sky have the likes of Micah Richard's who filmed himself banging a bird in a toilet a few years back 😅 Numerous other dodgy stuff too and no one says anything about that. Carragher spat at a young girl while Neville is happy for some of his businesses to fail and the taxpaper pick up the cost. Nothing illegal but from someone who bangs on about morals it looks a little bit hypocritical.

The current Sky set up is shocking bar Keane and even his rants have become a bit tired.
Touché

Keys is still a knob tho
 
So just you A Taylor and Craig Pawson then 😂
Live, from camera I didnt see it as red. In replay, I didnt see it as a red either,certainly in the first few. It was a flimsy block like tackle, although I did notice it happened to make contact with Semenyo on the knee.

The more times I watched the replay, especially the slow motion, I felt more and more it could have been a red card. The still makes it look horrific. So based on similar incidents, yes, could easily have been red.

But, in pre VAR days, it is never a red. It wasn't an aggressive, vicious lunge that endangered the opponent. Just an accidental contact in a challenge you'd expect a player to make. In VAR days, where the officials 300 miles away are continually looking at incidents to find a reason to intervene, it could easily be red.

I know people say Senenyo was lucky. Yes, he was lucky that Dalot didnt aggressively smash into his knee and break his leg. He was lucky that Dalot flapped into the challenge with no real force, so it ultimately stung a bit, but no real damage done.
 
Live, from camera I didnt see it as red. In replay, I didnt see it as a red either,certainly in the first few. It was a flimsy block like tackle, although I did notice it happened to make contact with Semenyo on the knee.

The more times I watched the replay, especially the slow motion, I felt more and more it could have been a red card. The still makes it look horrific. So based on similar incidents, yes, could easily have been red.

But, in pre VAR days, it is never a red. It wasn't an aggressive, vicious lunge that endangered the opponent. Just an accidental contact in a challenge you'd expect a player to make. In VAR days, where the officials 300 miles away are continually looking at incidents to find a reason to intervene, it could easily be red.

I know people say Senenyo was lucky. Yes, he was lucky that Dalot didnt aggressively smash into his knee and break his leg. He was lucky that Dalot flapped into the challenge with no real force, so it ultimately stung a bit, but no real damage done.

Did he intend to make contact as he did? We’d like to think no it wasn’t intentional. I certainly don’t think it was intentional. That then leads onto if he didn’t intend it, he wasn’t in control. Reckless? Dangerous?

I think he’s lucky it wasn’t a red card. I wouldn’t have been surprised if it had been a red, nor would I have had a gripe if it was a red.

I’m almost glad it wasn’t a red. 11 ‘v’ 10 would have spoiled a great match.
 
Did he intend to make contact as he did? We’d like to think no it wasn’t intentional. I certainly don’t think it was intentional. That then leads onto if he didn’t intend it, he wasn’t in control. Reckless? Dangerous?

I think he’s lucky it wasn’t a red card. I wouldn’t have been surprised if it had been a red, nor would I have had a gripe if it was a red.

I’m almost glad it wasn’t a red. 11 ‘v’ 10 would have spoiled a great match.
It is another reason I want VAR gone. Rather than expecting straight reds for aggressive, violent conduct, we expect big decisions on technicalities. Where did the studs catch the leg, red card if above a certain distance. Matters not it was a speedy 2 footed lunge, or if the player was stood still and happened to catch opponent in attempt to make challenge / interception.

Not just red cards. But goals scored, and VAR looking for the slightest of contact with goalscorers arm, that onfield ref would never see, to rule out a goal. Even though it wouldnt be a penalty if it hit defenders arm in the same way.

In VAR era, the Dalot incident will be shown many times this week, and people will (rightly) say it should be red based on historic decisions. No VAR, I doubt Sky would have shown more than one replay and we'd all have forgotten about it.

Sucks the life out of me when I see play is stopped because VAR are reviewing something
 
Top