Aztecs27
Money List Winner
….After he’d pulled Anderson’s shirt over his head.
PJ87
Journeyman Pro
We are also told now about "not enough contact" or "not long enough" not saying it's right or wrong .. but they are letting more go pen wise
AmandaJR
Money List Winner
I was kind of quoting VAR...it wasn't and it did have impact but again it was after he was fouled so...
Arthur Wedge
Well-known member
Hold was “fleating”
The same “fleating” that’s been used for a number of identical incidents this season
Don Barzini
Assistant Pro
Way to miss the point. But….meh…..I’m not getting into this with you I’m afraid. I’m in too much of a good mood to lock horns with someone who comes onto this thread and always acts like a man with a fork in a world full of soup.
Have a good evening.
PaulMdj
Well-known member
I wouldn’t worry too much!Way to miss the point. But….meh…..I’m not getting into this with you I’m afraid. I’m in too much of a good mood to lock horns with someone who comes onto this thread and always acts like a man with a fork in a world full of soup.
Have a good evening.
It now says “Banned” next his name.
PJ87
Journeyman Pro
I wouldn’t worry too much!
I'm sure it will say "deleted member" before too long like a lot of the previously banned do.. think it's so they can return as someone else and nobody can search their posting style (not a dig at you, we know you returned without being banned and were upfront about it)
If you are banned, you are banned. That's it
People with deleted member next to their name have chosen to leave and asked for their details to be removed. They can return but must be upfront that they are a returning member.
Back to the football, Forest deserved it today. Showed a real desire to win. Their goals were all legal, no issues there.
clubchamp98
Journeyman Pro
Havnt seen it yet I was out.Great pass from Nunez
clubchamp98
Journeyman Pro
Yes should be measured on their feet imo.
Don Barzini
Assistant Pro
Have now seen the “stonewall penalty” on a replay.
I’d have had absolutely no issue at all with it being given as a penalty - provided Morgan Rogers hadn’t pulled Anderson’s shirt over his head first. An act which is in itself a foul and which directly led him to be able to gain a yard or two on Anderson.
It’s either six of one, half a dozen of the other and play on. Or call the first offence and award a free kick to Forest.
EDIT. Watched it again. Initial contact by Anderson is outside the box anyway. So no penalty either way.
I’d have had absolutely no issue at all with it being given as a penalty - provided Morgan Rogers hadn’t pulled Anderson’s shirt over his head first. An act which is in itself a foul and which directly led him to be able to gain a yard or two on Anderson.
It’s either six of one, half a dozen of the other and play on. Or call the first offence and award a free kick to Forest.
EDIT. Watched it again. Initial contact by Anderson is outside the box anyway. So no penalty either way.
Last edited:
Aztecs27
Money List Winner
Shout out to Martinez for that goal line save in the 2nd half to deny Nico Dominguez. Absolutely world class.
clubchamp98
Journeyman Pro
Yes but we all know this season that shirt pulling isn’t a foul anymore.
Red devil
Well-known member
I think with Big Ange's position looking dodgy to say the least. Spurs could do no worse than look at Nuno to have a go.
Swango1980
Well-known member
Watching MOTD, and just noticed he got a second yellow as well. Getting a suspension when your team are struggling as it is, crazy unprofessional.
Saw that Cunha got involved as well, kept throwing his hand into one of the oppositions back room staff and ended up ripping off his glasses. Wonder if he'll get a slap on the wrist for that?
Aztecs27
Money List Winner
Not sure why he’d want to go back to that toxic hellhole? Made plenty of money in Saudi and is now somewhere he’s genuinely loved by the entire fanbase and community.
Never thought I’d love a manager more than I did Cooper but Nuno’s an absolutely incredible bloke.
Don Barzini
Assistant Pro
(Assuming you mean “Spurs could do worse” rather than “no worse”)…..
Ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!
Thank you SO MUCH for the laugh mate!
Swango1980
Well-known member
Southgate to be knighted
Arthur Wedge
Well-known member
So watched MOTD this morning
Fulham game was certainly exciting and great to see Jota back
But the ref
The tackle on Robbo by Diop - late and studs on the knee - how isn’t that a red
Then the studs on the back on Gravs Achilles - again a red
Robbo sending off - when I saw all the clips it looked cut and dry a red
But I thought the rule was “Denying a clear goal scoring opportunity” - Wilson wasn’t getting to the ball , Jiminez was and he had a shot - so they had a clear goal scoring opportunity - so why a red but can see why the ref gave it
Overall with 10 men it was a great game and good point
Rather annoying that the guy who scored the first prob should have been off
Robbo clearly not great after the tackle and prob should have been subbed before
Fulham game was certainly exciting and great to see Jota back
But the ref
The tackle on Robbo by Diop - late and studs on the knee - how isn’t that a red
Then the studs on the back on Gravs Achilles - again a red
Robbo sending off - when I saw all the clips it looked cut and dry a red
But I thought the rule was “Denying a clear goal scoring opportunity” - Wilson wasn’t getting to the ball , Jiminez was and he had a shot - so they had a clear goal scoring opportunity
- so why a red but can see why the ref gave it Overall with 10 men it was a great game and good point
Rather annoying that the guy who scored the first prob should have been off
Robbo clearly not great after the tackle and prob should have been subbed before
