D
Deleted member 1740
Guest
I think it's my biggest bugbear when a former player or analyst says "There was contact so he was entitled to go down". No he wasn't. If the contact was enough to make the player go down then that's fair enough. Just because there is some contact that's no reason for the player's back to arch and his legs to stop working.
Problem is now there’s genuine fouls not being given because they’re allowing stronger tackles etc. It’s a mess from top to bottom.